IDA blend vs Uganda: CPIA equity of public resource use rating
IDA blend
3.45 1=low to 6=high
in 2025
Uganda
4 1=low to 6=high
in 2025
IDA blend rank
14th
Uganda rank
13th
CPIA equity of public resource use rating over time
- IDA blend
- Uganda
How they compare
Uganda currently reports 4 1=low to 6=high against 3.45 1=low to 6=high in IDA blend, a difference of 0.55 1=low to 6=high.
That makes Uganda's figure about 1.2 times IDA blend's.
Across all 21 years both countries report, Uganda has been ahead every year.
IDA blend ranks 14th and Uganda ranks 13th of 42 groups.
Uganda has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | IDA blend | Uganda | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 3.16 1=low to 6=high | 4.3 1=low to 6=high | 1.14 1=low to 6=high | Uganda |
| 2010s | 3.37 1=low to 6=high | 4 1=low to 6=high | 0.6267 1=low to 6=high | Uganda |
| 2020s | 3.49 1=low to 6=high | 4 1=low to 6=high | 0.5079 1=low to 6=high | Uganda |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher cpia equity of public resource use rating, IDA blend or Uganda?
- Uganda, at 4 1=low to 6=high against 3.45 1=low to 6=high in IDA blend as of 2025.
- What is the difference in cpia equity of public resource use rating between IDA blend and Uganda?
- 0.55 1=low to 6=high, with Uganda ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for IDA blend and Uganda?
- 21 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2025.
- How do IDA blend and Uganda rank globally for cpia equity of public resource use rating?
- IDA blend ranks 14th and Uganda ranks 13th of 42 groups.
- Where does this data come from?
- CPIA database, World Bank Group (WBG), published as CPIA equity of public resource use rating (1=low to 6=high). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Equity of public resource use assesses the extent to which the pattern of public expenditures and revenue collection affects the poor and is consistent with national poverty reduction priorities.