IDA only vs Madagascar: CPIA equity of public resource use rating
IDA only
3.36 1=low to 6=high
in 2025
Madagascar
3.5 1=low to 6=high
in 2025
IDA only rank
27th
Madagascar rank
30th
CPIA equity of public resource use rating over time
- IDA only
- Madagascar
How they compare
Madagascar currently reports 3.5 1=low to 6=high against 3.36 1=low to 6=high in IDA only, a difference of 0.14 1=low to 6=high.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 21 shared years of data; in 2005 it was Madagascar ahead.
IDA only ranks 27th and Madagascar ranks 30th of 42 groups.
Across the 3 decades both report, IDA only averaged higher in 2 and Madagascar in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | IDA only | Madagascar | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 3.37 1=low to 6=high | 3.8 1=low to 6=high | 0.4258 1=low to 6=high | Madagascar |
| 2010s | 3.36 1=low to 6=high | 3.2 1=low to 6=high | 0.1596 1=low to 6=high | IDA only |
| 2020s | 3.36 1=low to 6=high | 3.17 1=low to 6=high | 0.1903 1=low to 6=high | IDA only |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher cpia equity of public resource use rating, IDA only or Madagascar?
- Madagascar, at 3.5 1=low to 6=high against 3.36 1=low to 6=high in IDA only as of 2025.
- What is the difference in cpia equity of public resource use rating between IDA only and Madagascar?
- 0.14 1=low to 6=high, with Madagascar ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for IDA only and Madagascar?
- 21 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2025.
- How do IDA only and Madagascar rank globally for cpia equity of public resource use rating?
- IDA only ranks 27th and Madagascar ranks 30th of 42 groups.
- Where does this data come from?
- CPIA database, World Bank Group (WBG), published as CPIA equity of public resource use rating (1=low to 6=high). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Equity of public resource use assesses the extent to which the pattern of public expenditures and revenue collection affects the poor and is consistent with national poverty reduction priorities.