Kiribati vs Mali: CPIA equity of public resource use rating
Kiribati
4 1=low to 6=high
in 2025
Mali
4 1=low to 6=high
in 2025
Kiribati rank
13th
Mali rank
13th
CPIA equity of public resource use rating over time
- Kiribati
- Mali
How they compare
Kiribati currently reports 4 1=low to 6=high against 4 1=low to 6=high in Mali, a difference of 0 1=low to 6=high.
Across all 21 years both countries report, Mali has been ahead every year.
Kiribati ranks 13th and Mali ranks 13th of 85 countries.
Mali has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Kiribati | Mali | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 3.2 1=low to 6=high | 3.5 1=low to 6=high | 0.3 1=low to 6=high | Mali |
| 2010s | 3.55 1=low to 6=high | 3.65 1=low to 6=high | 0.1 1=low to 6=high | Mali |
| 2020s | 3.58 1=low to 6=high | 4 1=low to 6=high | 0.4167 1=low to 6=high | Mali |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher cpia equity of public resource use rating, Kiribati or Mali?
- Kiribati, at 4 1=low to 6=high against 4 1=low to 6=high in Mali as of 2025.
- What is the difference in cpia equity of public resource use rating between Kiribati and Mali?
- 0 1=low to 6=high, with Kiribati ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Kiribati and Mali?
- 21 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2025.
- How do Kiribati and Mali rank globally for cpia equity of public resource use rating?
- Kiribati ranks 13th and Mali ranks 13th of 85 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- CPIA database, World Bank Group (WBG), published as CPIA equity of public resource use rating (1=low to 6=high). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Equity of public resource use assesses the extent to which the pattern of public expenditures and revenue collection affects the poor and is consistent with national poverty reduction priorities.