Kiribati vs Mongolia: CPIA equity of public resource use rating
Kiribati
4 1=low to 6=high
in 2025
Mongolia
4 1=low to 6=high
in 2019
Kiribati rank
13th
Mongolia rank
13th
CPIA equity of public resource use rating over time
- Kiribati
- Mongolia
How they compare
Kiribati currently reports 4 1=low to 6=high against 4 1=low to 6=high in Mongolia, a difference of 0 1=low to 6=high.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 15 shared years of data; in 2005 it was Mongolia ahead.
Kiribati ranks 13th and Mongolia ranks 13th of 85 countries.
Mongolia has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Kiribati | Mongolia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 3.2 1=low to 6=high | 3.4 1=low to 6=high | 0.2 1=low to 6=high | Mongolia |
| 2010s | 3.55 1=low to 6=high | 3.6 1=low to 6=high | 0.05 1=low to 6=high | Mongolia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher cpia equity of public resource use rating, Kiribati or Mongolia?
- Kiribati, at 4 1=low to 6=high against 4 1=low to 6=high in Mongolia as of 2025.
- What is the difference in cpia equity of public resource use rating between Kiribati and Mongolia?
- 0 1=low to 6=high, with Kiribati ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Kiribati and Mongolia?
- 15 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2019.
- How do Kiribati and Mongolia rank globally for cpia equity of public resource use rating?
- Kiribati ranks 13th and Mongolia ranks 13th of 85 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- CPIA database, World Bank Group (WBG), published as CPIA equity of public resource use rating (1=low to 6=high). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Equity of public resource use assesses the extent to which the pattern of public expenditures and revenue collection affects the poor and is consistent with national poverty reduction priorities.