Kiribati vs Senegal: CPIA equity of public resource use rating
Kiribati
4 1=low to 6=high
in 2025
Senegal
4 1=low to 6=high
in 2025
Kiribati rank
13th
Senegal rank
13th
CPIA equity of public resource use rating over time
- Kiribati
- Senegal
How they compare
Kiribati currently reports 4 1=low to 6=high against 4 1=low to 6=high in Senegal, a difference of 0 1=low to 6=high.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 21 shared years of data; in 2005 it was Senegal ahead.
Kiribati ranks 13th and Senegal ranks 13th of 85 countries.
Senegal has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Kiribati | Senegal | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 3.2 1=low to 6=high | 3.5 1=low to 6=high | 0.3 1=low to 6=high | Senegal |
| 2010s | 3.55 1=low to 6=high | 3.65 1=low to 6=high | 0.1 1=low to 6=high | Senegal |
| 2020s | 3.58 1=low to 6=high | 4 1=low to 6=high | 0.4167 1=low to 6=high | Senegal |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher cpia equity of public resource use rating, Kiribati or Senegal?
- Kiribati, at 4 1=low to 6=high against 4 1=low to 6=high in Senegal as of 2025.
- What is the difference in cpia equity of public resource use rating between Kiribati and Senegal?
- 0 1=low to 6=high, with Kiribati ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Kiribati and Senegal?
- 21 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2025.
- How do Kiribati and Senegal rank globally for cpia equity of public resource use rating?
- Kiribati ranks 13th and Senegal ranks 13th of 85 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- CPIA database, World Bank Group (WBG), published as CPIA equity of public resource use rating (1=low to 6=high). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Equity of public resource use assesses the extent to which the pattern of public expenditures and revenue collection affects the poor and is consistent with national poverty reduction priorities.