What is the difference in cpia equity of public resource use rating between Lao People's Democratic Republic and Mozambique?

0 1=low to 6=high, with Lao People's Democratic Republic ahead.

How many years of comparable data are there for Lao People's Democratic Republic and Mozambique?

21 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2025.

Where does this data come from?

CPIA database, World Bank Group (WBG), published as CPIA equity of public resource use rating (1=low to 6=high). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Lao People's Democratic Republic vs Mozambique: CPIA equity of public resource use rating

Lao People's Democratic Republic

3 1=low to 6=high

in 2025

Mozambique

3 1=low to 6=high

in 2025

Lao People's Democratic Republic rank

55th

Mozambique rank

55th

CPIA equity of public resource use rating over time

Lao People's Democratic Republic
Mozambique

How they compare

Lao People's Democratic Republic currently reports 3 1=low to 6=high against 3 1=low to 6=high in Mozambique, a difference of 0 1=low to 6=high.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 21 shared years of data; in 2005 it was Mozambique ahead.

Lao People's Democratic Republic ranks 55th and Mozambique ranks 55th of 85 countries.

Lao People's Democratic Republic has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade	Lao People's Democratic Republic	Mozambique	Difference	Ahead
2000s	3.7 1=low to 6=high	3.5 1=low to 6=high	0.2 1=low to 6=high	Lao People's Democratic Republic
2010s	3.75 1=low to 6=high	3.05 1=low to 6=high	0.7 1=low to 6=high	Lao People's Democratic Republic
2020s	3.25 1=low to 6=high	3 1=low to 6=high	0.25 1=low to 6=high	Lao People's Democratic Republic

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher cpia equity of public resource use rating, Lao People's Democratic Republic or Mozambique?: Lao People's Democratic Republic, at 3 1=low to 6=high against 3 1=low to 6=high in Mozambique as of 2025.
What is the difference in cpia equity of public resource use rating between Lao People's Democratic Republic and Mozambique?: 0 1=low to 6=high, with Lao People's Democratic Republic ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Lao People's Democratic Republic and Mozambique?: 21 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2025.
How do Lao People's Democratic Republic and Mozambique rank globally for cpia equity of public resource use rating?: Lao People's Democratic Republic ranks 55th and Mozambique ranks 55th of 85 countries.
Where does this data come from?: CPIA database, World Bank Group (WBG), published as CPIA equity of public resource use rating (1=low to 6=high). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Lao People's Democratic Republic vs Mozambique: CPIA equity of public resource use rating. Statizoid, drawing on CPIA database, World Bank Group (WBG). Retrieved 11 September 2026, from https://public-sector.statizoid.com/compare/cpia-equity-of-public-resource-use-rating-1-low-to-6-high/lao-pdr/mozambique/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://public-sector.statizoid.com/compare/cpia-equity-of-public-resource-use-rating-1-low-to-6-high/lao-pdr/mozambique/">Lao People's Democratic Republic vs Mozambique: CPIA equity of public resource use rating</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator: CPIA equity of public resource use rating (1=low to 6=high)
Unit: 1=low to 6=high
Source: CPIA database, World Bank Group (WBG)
Licence: CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage: 127 places, 2,460 data points, 2005–2025
Last refreshed: 03 September 2026

Equity of public resource use assesses the extent to which the pattern of public expenditures and revenue collection affects the poor and is consistent with national poverty reduction priorities.