Laos vs Mozambique: CPIA equity of public resource use rating (1=low to 6=high)
Laos
3 1=low to 6=high
in 2025
Mozambique
3 1=low to 6=high
in 2025
Laos rank
55th
Mozambique rank
55th
CPIA equity of public resource use rating (1=low to 6=high) over time
- Laos
- Mozambique
How they compare
Laos currently reports 3 1=low to 6=high against 3 1=low to 6=high in Mozambique, a difference of 0 1=low to 6=high.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 21 shared years of data; in 2005 it was Mozambique ahead.
Laos ranks 55th and Mozambique ranks 55th of 85 countries.
Laos has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Laos | Mozambique | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 3.7 1=low to 6=high | 3.5 1=low to 6=high | 0.2 1=low to 6=high | Laos |
| 2010s | 3.75 1=low to 6=high | 3.05 1=low to 6=high | 0.7 1=low to 6=high | Laos |
| 2020s | 3.25 1=low to 6=high | 3 1=low to 6=high | 0.25 1=low to 6=high | Laos |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher cpia equity of public resource use rating, Laos or Mozambique?
- Laos, at 3 1=low to 6=high against 3 1=low to 6=high in Mozambique as of 2025.
- What is the difference in cpia equity of public resource use rating between Laos and Mozambique?
- 0 1=low to 6=high, with Laos ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Laos and Mozambique?
- 21 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2025.
- How do Laos and Mozambique rank globally for cpia equity of public resource use rating?
- Laos ranks 55th and Mozambique ranks 55th of 85 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- CPIA database, World Bank Group (WBG), published as CPIA equity of public resource use rating (1=low to 6=high). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Equity of public resource use assesses the extent to which the pattern of public expenditures and revenue collection affects the poor and is consistent with national poverty reduction priorities.