Lesotho vs Sri Lanka: CPIA equity of public resource use rating
Lesotho
3 1=low to 6=high
in 2025
Sri Lanka
3 1=low to 6=high
in 2025
Lesotho rank
55th
Sri Lanka rank
55th
CPIA equity of public resource use rating over time
- Lesotho
- Sri Lanka
How they compare
Lesotho currently reports 3 1=low to 6=high against 3 1=low to 6=high in Sri Lanka, a difference of 0 1=low to 6=high.
Across all 16 years both countries report, Sri Lanka has been ahead every year.
Lesotho ranks 55th and Sri Lanka ranks 55th of 85 countries.
Sri Lanka has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Lesotho | Sri Lanka | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 3 1=low to 6=high | 3.5 1=low to 6=high | 0.5 1=low to 6=high | Sri Lanka |
| 2010s | 3 1=low to 6=high | 3.5 1=low to 6=high | 0.5 1=low to 6=high | Sri Lanka |
| 2020s | 3 1=low to 6=high | 3.12 1=low to 6=high | 0.125 1=low to 6=high | Sri Lanka |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher cpia equity of public resource use rating, Lesotho or Sri Lanka?
- Lesotho, at 3 1=low to 6=high against 3 1=low to 6=high in Sri Lanka as of 2025.
- What is the difference in cpia equity of public resource use rating between Lesotho and Sri Lanka?
- 0 1=low to 6=high, with Lesotho ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Lesotho and Sri Lanka?
- 16 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2025.
- How do Lesotho and Sri Lanka rank globally for cpia equity of public resource use rating?
- Lesotho ranks 55th and Sri Lanka ranks 55th of 85 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- CPIA database, World Bank Group (WBG), published as CPIA equity of public resource use rating (1=low to 6=high). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Equity of public resource use assesses the extent to which the pattern of public expenditures and revenue collection affects the poor and is consistent with national poverty reduction priorities.