Madagascar vs Nicaragua: CPIA equity of public resource use rating
Madagascar
3.5 1=low to 6=high
in 2025
Nicaragua
3.5 1=low to 6=high
in 2025
Madagascar rank
30th
Nicaragua rank
30th
CPIA equity of public resource use rating over time
- Madagascar
- Nicaragua
How they compare
Madagascar currently reports 3.5 1=low to 6=high against 3.5 1=low to 6=high in Nicaragua, a difference of 0 1=low to 6=high.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 21 shared years of data; in 2005 it was Nicaragua ahead.
Madagascar ranks 30th and Nicaragua ranks 30th of 85 countries.
Nicaragua has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Madagascar | Nicaragua | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 3.8 1=low to 6=high | 3.9 1=low to 6=high | 0.1 1=low to 6=high | Nicaragua |
| 2010s | 3.2 1=low to 6=high | 4 1=low to 6=high | 0.8 1=low to 6=high | Nicaragua |
| 2020s | 3.17 1=low to 6=high | 3.67 1=low to 6=high | 0.5 1=low to 6=high | Nicaragua |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher cpia equity of public resource use rating, Madagascar or Nicaragua?
- Madagascar, at 3.5 1=low to 6=high against 3.5 1=low to 6=high in Nicaragua as of 2025.
- What is the difference in cpia equity of public resource use rating between Madagascar and Nicaragua?
- 0 1=low to 6=high, with Madagascar ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Madagascar and Nicaragua?
- 21 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2025.
- How do Madagascar and Nicaragua rank globally for cpia equity of public resource use rating?
- Madagascar ranks 30th and Nicaragua ranks 30th of 85 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- CPIA database, World Bank Group (WBG), published as CPIA equity of public resource use rating (1=low to 6=high). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Equity of public resource use assesses the extent to which the pattern of public expenditures and revenue collection affects the poor and is consistent with national poverty reduction priorities.