Maldives vs Republic of Moldova: CPIA equity of public resource use rating
Maldives
3.5 1=low to 6=high
in 2025
Republic of Moldova
3.5 1=low to 6=high
in 2019
Maldives rank
30th
Republic of Moldova rank
30th
CPIA equity of public resource use rating over time
- Maldives
- Republic of Moldova
How they compare
Maldives currently reports 3.5 1=low to 6=high against 3.5 1=low to 6=high in Republic of Moldova, a difference of 0 1=low to 6=high.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 15 shared years of data; in 2005 it was Maldives ahead.
Maldives ranks 30th and Republic of Moldova ranks 30th of 85 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Maldives averaged higher in 1 and Republic of Moldova in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Maldives | Republic of Moldova | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 4 1=low to 6=high | 3.5 1=low to 6=high | 0.5 1=low to 6=high | Maldives |
| 2010s | 3.15 1=low to 6=high | 3.7 1=low to 6=high | 0.55 1=low to 6=high | Republic of Moldova |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher cpia equity of public resource use rating, Maldives or Republic of Moldova?
- Maldives, at 3.5 1=low to 6=high against 3.5 1=low to 6=high in Republic of Moldova as of 2025.
- What is the difference in cpia equity of public resource use rating between Maldives and Republic of Moldova?
- 0 1=low to 6=high, with Maldives ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Maldives and Republic of Moldova?
- 15 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2019.
- How do Maldives and Republic of Moldova rank globally for cpia equity of public resource use rating?
- Maldives ranks 30th and Republic of Moldova ranks 30th of 85 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- CPIA database, World Bank Group (WBG), published as CPIA equity of public resource use rating (1=low to 6=high). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Equity of public resource use assesses the extent to which the pattern of public expenditures and revenue collection affects the poor and is consistent with national poverty reduction priorities.