Mauritania vs Togo: CPIA equity of public resource use rating
Mauritania
4.5 1=low to 6=high
in 2025
Togo
4.5 1=low to 6=high
in 2025
Mauritania rank
1st
Togo rank
1st
CPIA equity of public resource use rating over time
- Mauritania
- Togo
How they compare
Mauritania currently reports 4.5 1=low to 6=high against 4.5 1=low to 6=high in Togo, a difference of 0 1=low to 6=high.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 21 shared years of data; in 2005 it was Mauritania ahead.
Mauritania ranks 1st and Togo ranks 1st of 85 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Mauritania averaged higher in 2 and Togo in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Mauritania | Togo | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 3.4 1=low to 6=high | 2 1=low to 6=high | 1.4 1=low to 6=high | Mauritania |
| 2010s | 3.9 1=low to 6=high | 3.35 1=low to 6=high | 0.55 1=low to 6=high | Mauritania |
| 2020s | 4.42 1=low to 6=high | 4.5 1=low to 6=high | 0.0833 1=low to 6=high | Togo |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher cpia equity of public resource use rating, Mauritania or Togo?
- Mauritania, at 4.5 1=low to 6=high against 4.5 1=low to 6=high in Togo as of 2025.
- What is the difference in cpia equity of public resource use rating between Mauritania and Togo?
- 0 1=low to 6=high, with Mauritania ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Mauritania and Togo?
- 21 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2025.
- How do Mauritania and Togo rank globally for cpia equity of public resource use rating?
- Mauritania ranks 1st and Togo ranks 1st of 85 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- CPIA database, World Bank Group (WBG), published as CPIA equity of public resource use rating (1=low to 6=high). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Equity of public resource use assesses the extent to which the pattern of public expenditures and revenue collection affects the poor and is consistent with national poverty reduction priorities.