Middle income vs Mongolia: CPIA equity of public resource use rating
Middle income
3.49 1=low to 6=high
in 2025
Mongolia
4 1=low to 6=high
in 2019
Middle income rank
10th
Mongolia rank
13th
CPIA equity of public resource use rating over time
- Middle income
- Mongolia
How they compare
Mongolia currently reports 4 1=low to 6=high against 3.49 1=low to 6=high in Middle income, a difference of 0.51 1=low to 6=high.
That makes Mongolia's figure about 1.1 times Middle income's.
The two have swapped places 4 times across 15 shared years of data; in 2005 it was Mongolia ahead.
Middle income ranks 10th and Mongolia ranks 13th of 42 groups.
Across the 2 decades both report, Middle income averaged higher in 1 and Mongolia in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Middle income | Mongolia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 3.4 1=low to 6=high | 3.4 1=low to 6=high | 0.0022 1=low to 6=high | Middle income |
| 2010s | 3.45 1=low to 6=high | 3.6 1=low to 6=high | 0.1527 1=low to 6=high | Mongolia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher cpia equity of public resource use rating, Middle income or Mongolia?
- Mongolia, at 4 1=low to 6=high against 3.49 1=low to 6=high in Middle income as of 2019.
- What is the difference in cpia equity of public resource use rating between Middle income and Mongolia?
- 0.51 1=low to 6=high, with Mongolia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Middle income and Mongolia?
- 15 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2019.
- How do Middle income and Mongolia rank globally for cpia equity of public resource use rating?
- Middle income ranks 10th and Mongolia ranks 13th of 42 groups.
- Where does this data come from?
- CPIA database, World Bank Group (WBG), published as CPIA equity of public resource use rating (1=low to 6=high). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Equity of public resource use assesses the extent to which the pattern of public expenditures and revenue collection affects the poor and is consistent with national poverty reduction priorities.