Middle income vs Uganda: CPIA equity of public resource use rating
Middle income
3.49 1=low to 6=high
in 2025
Uganda
4 1=low to 6=high
in 2025
Middle income rank
10th
Uganda rank
13th
CPIA equity of public resource use rating over time
- Middle income
- Uganda
How they compare
Uganda currently reports 4 1=low to 6=high against 3.49 1=low to 6=high in Middle income, a difference of 0.51 1=low to 6=high.
That makes Uganda's figure about 1.1 times Middle income's.
Across all 21 years both countries report, Uganda has been ahead every year.
Middle income ranks 10th and Uganda ranks 13th of 42 groups.
Uganda has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Middle income | Uganda | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 3.4 1=low to 6=high | 4.3 1=low to 6=high | 0.8978 1=low to 6=high | Uganda |
| 2010s | 3.45 1=low to 6=high | 4 1=low to 6=high | 0.5527 1=low to 6=high | Uganda |
| 2020s | 3.49 1=low to 6=high | 4 1=low to 6=high | 0.5083 1=low to 6=high | Uganda |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher cpia equity of public resource use rating, Middle income or Uganda?
- Uganda, at 4 1=low to 6=high against 3.49 1=low to 6=high in Middle income as of 2025.
- What is the difference in cpia equity of public resource use rating between Middle income and Uganda?
- 0.51 1=low to 6=high, with Uganda ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Middle income and Uganda?
- 21 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2025.
- How do Middle income and Uganda rank globally for cpia equity of public resource use rating?
- Middle income ranks 10th and Uganda ranks 13th of 42 groups.
- Where does this data come from?
- CPIA database, World Bank Group (WBG), published as CPIA equity of public resource use rating (1=low to 6=high). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Equity of public resource use assesses the extent to which the pattern of public expenditures and revenue collection affects the poor and is consistent with national poverty reduction priorities.