Republic of Moldova vs Nepal: CPIA equity of public resource use rating
Republic of Moldova
3.5 1=low to 6=high
in 2019
Nepal
3.5 1=low to 6=high
in 2025
Republic of Moldova rank
30th
Nepal rank
30th
CPIA equity of public resource use rating over time
- Republic of Moldova
- Nepal
How they compare
Republic of Moldova currently reports 3.5 1=low to 6=high against 3.5 1=low to 6=high in Nepal, a difference of 0 1=low to 6=high.
Across all 15 years both countries report, Nepal has been ahead every year.
Republic of Moldova ranks 30th and Nepal ranks 30th of 85 countries.
Nepal has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Republic of Moldova | Nepal | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 3.5 1=low to 6=high | 3.6 1=low to 6=high | 0.1 1=low to 6=high | Nepal |
| 2010s | 3.7 1=low to 6=high | 4 1=low to 6=high | 0.3 1=low to 6=high | Nepal |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher cpia equity of public resource use rating, Republic of Moldova or Nepal?
- Republic of Moldova, at 3.5 1=low to 6=high against 3.5 1=low to 6=high in Nepal as of 2019.
- What is the difference in cpia equity of public resource use rating between Republic of Moldova and Nepal?
- 0 1=low to 6=high, with Republic of Moldova ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Republic of Moldova and Nepal?
- 15 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2019.
- How do Republic of Moldova and Nepal rank globally for cpia equity of public resource use rating?
- Republic of Moldova ranks 30th and Nepal ranks 30th of 85 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- CPIA database, World Bank Group (WBG), published as CPIA equity of public resource use rating (1=low to 6=high). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Equity of public resource use assesses the extent to which the pattern of public expenditures and revenue collection affects the poor and is consistent with national poverty reduction priorities.