Nepal vs Small states: CPIA equity of public resource use rating
Nepal
3.5 1=low to 6=high
in 2025
Small states
3.35 1=low to 6=high
in 2025
Nepal rank
30th
Small states rank
28th
CPIA equity of public resource use rating over time
- Nepal
- Small states
How they compare
Nepal currently reports 3.5 1=low to 6=high against 3.35 1=low to 6=high in Small states, a difference of 0.15 1=low to 6=high.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 21 shared years of data; in 2005 it was Small states ahead.
Nepal ranks 30th and Small states ranks 28th of 85 countries.
Nepal has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Nepal | Small states | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 3.6 1=low to 6=high | 3.49 1=low to 6=high | 0.1051 1=low to 6=high | Nepal |
| 2010s | 4 1=low to 6=high | 3.33 1=low to 6=high | 0.6721 1=low to 6=high | Nepal |
| 2020s | 3.58 1=low to 6=high | 3.36 1=low to 6=high | 0.2232 1=low to 6=high | Nepal |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher cpia equity of public resource use rating, Nepal or Small states?
- Nepal, at 3.5 1=low to 6=high against 3.35 1=low to 6=high in Small states as of 2025.
- What is the difference in cpia equity of public resource use rating between Nepal and Small states?
- 0.15 1=low to 6=high, with Nepal ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Nepal and Small states?
- 21 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2025.
- How do Nepal and Small states rank globally for cpia equity of public resource use rating?
- Nepal ranks 30th and Small states ranks 28th of 85 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- CPIA database, World Bank Group (WBG), published as CPIA equity of public resource use rating (1=low to 6=high). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Equity of public resource use assesses the extent to which the pattern of public expenditures and revenue collection affects the poor and is consistent with national poverty reduction priorities.