Rwanda vs Uzbekistan: CPIA equity of public resource use rating
Rwanda
4.5 1=low to 6=high
in 2025
Uzbekistan
4.5 1=low to 6=high
in 2025
Rwanda rank
1st
Uzbekistan rank
1st
CPIA equity of public resource use rating over time
- Rwanda
- Uzbekistan
How they compare
Rwanda currently reports 4.5 1=low to 6=high against 4.5 1=low to 6=high in Uzbekistan, a difference of 0 1=low to 6=high.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 21 shared years of data; in 2005 it was Rwanda ahead.
Rwanda ranks 1st and Uzbekistan ranks 1st of 85 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Rwanda averaged higher in 2 and Uzbekistan in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Rwanda | Uzbekistan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 4.4 1=low to 6=high | 3.5 1=low to 6=high | 0.9 1=low to 6=high | Rwanda |
| 2010s | 4.45 1=low to 6=high | 3.75 1=low to 6=high | 0.7 1=low to 6=high | Rwanda |
| 2020s | 4.08 1=low to 6=high | 4.33 1=low to 6=high | 0.25 1=low to 6=high | Uzbekistan |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher cpia equity of public resource use rating, Rwanda or Uzbekistan?
- Rwanda, at 4.5 1=low to 6=high against 4.5 1=low to 6=high in Uzbekistan as of 2025.
- What is the difference in cpia equity of public resource use rating between Rwanda and Uzbekistan?
- 0 1=low to 6=high, with Rwanda ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Rwanda and Uzbekistan?
- 21 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2025.
- How do Rwanda and Uzbekistan rank globally for cpia equity of public resource use rating?
- Rwanda ranks 1st and Uzbekistan ranks 1st of 85 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- CPIA database, World Bank Group (WBG), published as CPIA equity of public resource use rating (1=low to 6=high). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Equity of public resource use assesses the extent to which the pattern of public expenditures and revenue collection affects the poor and is consistent with national poverty reduction priorities.