Sri Lanka vs East Timor: CPIA equity of public resource use rating (1=low to 6=high)
Sri Lanka
3 1=low to 6=high
in 2025
East Timor
3 1=low to 6=high
in 2025
Sri Lanka rank
55th
East Timor rank
55th
CPIA equity of public resource use rating (1=low to 6=high) over time
- Sri Lanka
- East Timor
How they compare
Sri Lanka currently reports 3 1=low to 6=high against 3 1=low to 6=high in East Timor, a difference of 0 1=low to 6=high.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 15 shared years of data; in 2006 it was Sri Lanka ahead.
Sri Lanka ranks 55th and East Timor ranks 55th of 85 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Sri Lanka averaged higher in 2 and East Timor in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Sri Lanka | East Timor | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 3.5 1=low to 6=high | 3 1=low to 6=high | 0.5 1=low to 6=high | Sri Lanka |
| 2010s | 3.5 1=low to 6=high | 3.43 1=low to 6=high | 0.0714 1=low to 6=high | Sri Lanka |
| 2020s | 3.12 1=low to 6=high | 3.38 1=low to 6=high | 0.25 1=low to 6=high | East Timor |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher cpia equity of public resource use rating, Sri Lanka or East Timor?
- Sri Lanka, at 3 1=low to 6=high against 3 1=low to 6=high in East Timor as of 2025.
- What is the difference in cpia equity of public resource use rating between Sri Lanka and East Timor?
- 0 1=low to 6=high, with Sri Lanka ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Sri Lanka and East Timor?
- 15 years are reported by both, from 2006 to 2025.
- How do Sri Lanka and East Timor rank globally for cpia equity of public resource use rating?
- Sri Lanka ranks 55th and East Timor ranks 55th of 85 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- CPIA database, World Bank Group (WBG), published as CPIA equity of public resource use rating (1=low to 6=high). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Equity of public resource use assesses the extent to which the pattern of public expenditures and revenue collection affects the poor and is consistent with national poverty reduction priorities.