Sri Lanka vs Timor-Leste: CPIA equity of public resource use rating
Sri Lanka
3 1=low to 6=high
in 2025
Timor-Leste
3 1=low to 6=high
in 2025
Sri Lanka rank
55th
Timor-Leste rank
55th
CPIA equity of public resource use rating over time
- Sri Lanka
- Timor-Leste
How they compare
Sri Lanka currently reports 3 1=low to 6=high against 3 1=low to 6=high in Timor-Leste, a difference of 0 1=low to 6=high.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 15 shared years of data; in 2006 it was Sri Lanka ahead.
Sri Lanka ranks 55th and Timor-Leste ranks 55th of 85 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Sri Lanka averaged higher in 2 and Timor-Leste in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Sri Lanka | Timor-Leste | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 3.5 1=low to 6=high | 3 1=low to 6=high | 0.5 1=low to 6=high | Sri Lanka |
| 2010s | 3.5 1=low to 6=high | 3.43 1=low to 6=high | 0.0714 1=low to 6=high | Sri Lanka |
| 2020s | 3.12 1=low to 6=high | 3.38 1=low to 6=high | 0.25 1=low to 6=high | Timor-Leste |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher cpia equity of public resource use rating, Sri Lanka or Timor-Leste?
- Sri Lanka, at 3 1=low to 6=high against 3 1=low to 6=high in Timor-Leste as of 2025.
- What is the difference in cpia equity of public resource use rating between Sri Lanka and Timor-Leste?
- 0 1=low to 6=high, with Sri Lanka ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Sri Lanka and Timor-Leste?
- 15 years are reported by both, from 2006 to 2025.
- How do Sri Lanka and Timor-Leste rank globally for cpia equity of public resource use rating?
- Sri Lanka ranks 55th and Timor-Leste ranks 55th of 85 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- CPIA database, World Bank Group (WBG), published as CPIA equity of public resource use rating (1=low to 6=high). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Equity of public resource use assesses the extent to which the pattern of public expenditures and revenue collection affects the poor and is consistent with national poverty reduction priorities.