Sri Lanka vs Vanuatu: CPIA equity of public resource use rating
Sri Lanka
3 1=low to 6=high
in 2025
Vanuatu
3 1=low to 6=high
in 2025
Sri Lanka rank
55th
Vanuatu rank
55th
CPIA equity of public resource use rating over time
- Sri Lanka
- Vanuatu
How they compare
Sri Lanka currently reports 3 1=low to 6=high against 3 1=low to 6=high in Vanuatu, a difference of 0 1=low to 6=high.
The two have swapped places 4 times across 16 shared years of data; in 2005 it was Vanuatu ahead.
Sri Lanka ranks 55th and Vanuatu ranks 55th of 85 countries.
Sri Lanka has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Sri Lanka | Vanuatu | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 3.5 1=low to 6=high | 3.5 1=low to 6=high | 0 1=low to 6=high | — |
| 2010s | 3.5 1=low to 6=high | 3.43 1=low to 6=high | 0.0714 1=low to 6=high | Sri Lanka |
| 2020s | 3.12 1=low to 6=high | 3 1=low to 6=high | 0.125 1=low to 6=high | Sri Lanka |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher cpia equity of public resource use rating, Sri Lanka or Vanuatu?
- Sri Lanka, at 3 1=low to 6=high against 3 1=low to 6=high in Vanuatu as of 2025.
- What is the difference in cpia equity of public resource use rating between Sri Lanka and Vanuatu?
- 0 1=low to 6=high, with Sri Lanka ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Sri Lanka and Vanuatu?
- 16 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2025.
- How do Sri Lanka and Vanuatu rank globally for cpia equity of public resource use rating?
- Sri Lanka ranks 55th and Vanuatu ranks 55th of 85 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- CPIA database, World Bank Group (WBG), published as CPIA equity of public resource use rating (1=low to 6=high). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Equity of public resource use assesses the extent to which the pattern of public expenditures and revenue collection affects the poor and is consistent with national poverty reduction priorities.