East Timor vs Vanuatu: CPIA equity of public resource use rating (1=low to 6=high)
East Timor
3 1=low to 6=high
in 2025
Vanuatu
3 1=low to 6=high
in 2025
East Timor rank
55th
Vanuatu rank
55th
CPIA equity of public resource use rating (1=low to 6=high) over time
- East Timor
- Vanuatu
How they compare
East Timor currently reports 3 1=low to 6=high against 3 1=low to 6=high in Vanuatu, a difference of 0 1=low to 6=high.
The two have swapped places 4 times across 20 shared years of data; in 2006 it was Vanuatu ahead.
East Timor ranks 55th and Vanuatu ranks 55th of 85 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, East Timor averaged higher in 1 and Vanuatu in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | East Timor | Vanuatu | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 3 1=low to 6=high | 3.5 1=low to 6=high | 0.5 1=low to 6=high | Vanuatu |
| 2010s | 3.45 1=low to 6=high | 3.45 1=low to 6=high | 0 1=low to 6=high | — |
| 2020s | 3.42 1=low to 6=high | 3.08 1=low to 6=high | 0.3333 1=low to 6=high | East Timor |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher cpia equity of public resource use rating, East Timor or Vanuatu?
- East Timor, at 3 1=low to 6=high against 3 1=low to 6=high in Vanuatu as of 2025.
- What is the difference in cpia equity of public resource use rating between East Timor and Vanuatu?
- 0 1=low to 6=high, with East Timor ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for East Timor and Vanuatu?
- 20 years are reported by both, from 2006 to 2025.
- How do East Timor and Vanuatu rank globally for cpia equity of public resource use rating?
- East Timor ranks 55th and Vanuatu ranks 55th of 85 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- CPIA database, World Bank Group (WBG), published as CPIA equity of public resource use rating (1=low to 6=high). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Equity of public resource use assesses the extent to which the pattern of public expenditures and revenue collection affects the poor and is consistent with national poverty reduction priorities.