Comoros vs Congo, Democratic Republic of the: CPIA financial sector rating
CPIA financial sector rating over time
- Comoros
- Congo, Democratic Republic of the
How they compare
Comoros currently reports 2.5 1=low to 6=high against 2.5 1=low to 6=high in Congo, Democratic Republic of the, a difference of 0 1=low to 6=high.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 21 shared years of data; in 2005 it was Comoros ahead.
Comoros ranks 53rd and Congo, Democratic Republic of the ranks 53rd of 84 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Comoros averaged higher in 2 and Congo, Democratic Republic of the in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Comoros | Congo, Democratic Republic of the | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 2.5 1=low to 6=high | 2 1=low to 6=high | 0.5 1=low to 6=high | Comoros |
| 2010s | 2.7 1=low to 6=high | 2.4 1=low to 6=high | 0.3 1=low to 6=high | Comoros |
| 2020s | 2.25 1=low to 6=high | 2.5 1=low to 6=high | 0.25 1=low to 6=high | Congo, Democratic Republic of the |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher cpia financial sector rating, Comoros or Congo, Democratic Republic of the?
- Comoros, at 2.5 1=low to 6=high against 2.5 1=low to 6=high in Congo, Democratic Republic of the as of 2025.
- What is the difference in cpia financial sector rating between Comoros and Congo, Democratic Republic of the?
- 0 1=low to 6=high, with Comoros ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Comoros and Congo, Democratic Republic of the?
- 21 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2025.
- How do Comoros and Congo, Democratic Republic of the rank globally for cpia financial sector rating?
- Comoros ranks 53rd and Congo, Democratic Republic of the ranks 53rd of 84 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- CPIA database, World Bank Group (WBG), published as CPIA financial sector rating (1=low to 6=high). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The CPIA measures the extent to which a country’s policy and institutional framework supports sustainable growth and poverty reduction, and consequently the effective use of development assistance. The outcome of the exercise yields both an overall score and scores for sixteen criteria that compose the CPIA. These criteria include: A. Economic Management (1. Monetary and Exchange Rate Policies; 2. Fiscal Policy; 3. Debt Policy and Management), B. Structural Policies (4. Trade; 5. Financial Sector; 6. Business Regulatory Environment), C. Policies for Social Inclusion/Equity (7. Gender equality; 8. Equity of public resource use; 9. Building human resources; 10. Social protection and labor; 11. Policies and institutions for environmental sustainability), D. Public Sector Management and Institutions (12. Property rights and rule-based governance; 13. Quality of budgetary and financial management; 14. Efficiency of revenue mobilization; 15. Quality of public administration; 16. Transparency, accountability, and corruption in the public sector). The financial sector criterion assesses the policies and regulations that affect financial sector development. Three dimensions are covered: (a) financial stability; (b) the sector’s efficiency, depth, and resource mobilization strength; and (c) access to financial services.