Democratic Republic of Congo vs East Timor: CPIA financial sector rating
CPIA financial sector rating over time
- Democratic Republic of Congo
- East Timor
How they compare
Democratic Republic of Congo currently reports 2.5 1=low to 6=high against 2.5 1=low to 6=high in East Timor, a difference of 0 1=low to 6=high.
Across all 20 years both countries report, East Timor has been ahead every year.
Democratic Republic of Congo ranks 53rd and East Timor ranks 53rd of 84 countries.
East Timor has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Democratic Republic of Congo | East Timor | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 2 1=low to 6=high | 2.5 1=low to 6=high | 0.5 1=low to 6=high | East Timor |
| 2010s | 2.4 1=low to 6=high | 2.5 1=low to 6=high | 0.1 1=low to 6=high | East Timor |
| 2020s | 2.5 1=low to 6=high | 2.58 1=low to 6=high | 0.0833 1=low to 6=high | East Timor |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher cpia financial sector rating, Democratic Republic of Congo or East Timor?
- Democratic Republic of Congo, at 2.5 1=low to 6=high against 2.5 1=low to 6=high in East Timor as of 2025.
- What is the difference in cpia financial sector rating between Democratic Republic of Congo and East Timor?
- 0 1=low to 6=high, with Democratic Republic of Congo ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Democratic Republic of Congo and East Timor?
- 20 years are reported by both, from 2006 to 2025.
- How do Democratic Republic of Congo and East Timor rank globally for cpia financial sector rating?
- Democratic Republic of Congo ranks 53rd and East Timor ranks 53rd of 84 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- CPIA database, World Bank Group (WBG), published as CPIA financial sector rating (1=low to 6=high). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The CPIA measures the extent to which a country’s policy and institutional framework supports sustainable growth and poverty reduction, and consequently the effective use of development assistance. The outcome of the exercise yields both an overall score and scores for sixteen criteria that compose the CPIA. These criteria include: A. Economic Management (1. Monetary and Exchange Rate Policies; 2. Fiscal Policy; 3. Debt Policy and Management), B. Structural Policies (4. Trade; 5. Financial Sector; 6. Business Regulatory Environment), C. Policies for Social Inclusion/Equity (7. Gender equality; 8. Equity of public resource use; 9. Building human resources; 10. Social protection and labor; 11. Policies and institutions for environmental sustainability), D. Public Sector Management and Institutions (12. Property rights and rule-based governance; 13. Quality of budgetary and financial management; 14. Efficiency of revenue mobilization; 15. Quality of public administration; 16. Transparency, accountability, and corruption in the public sector). The financial sector criterion assesses the policies and regulations that affect financial sector development. Three dimensions are covered: (a) financial stability; (b) the sector’s efficiency, depth, and resource mobilization strength; and (c) access to financial services.