Kosovo (UNSCR 1244) vs Rwanda: CPIA financial sector rating (1=low to 6=high)
CPIA financial sector rating (1=low to 6=high) over time
- Kosovo (UNSCR 1244)
- Rwanda
How they compare
Kosovo (UNSCR 1244) currently reports 4 1=low to 6=high against 4 1=low to 6=high in Rwanda, a difference of 0 1=low to 6=high.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 17 shared years of data; in 2009 it was Rwanda ahead.
Kosovo (UNSCR 1244) ranks 1st and Rwanda ranks 1st of 85 countries.
Kosovo (UNSCR 1244) has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Kosovo (UNSCR 1244) | Rwanda | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 3.5 1=low to 6=high | 3.5 1=low to 6=high | 0 1=low to 6=high | — |
| 2010s | 3.55 1=low to 6=high | 3.5 1=low to 6=high | 0.05 1=low to 6=high | Kosovo (UNSCR 1244) |
| 2020s | 4 1=low to 6=high | 3.67 1=low to 6=high | 0.3333 1=low to 6=high | Kosovo (UNSCR 1244) |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher cpia financial sector rating, Kosovo (UNSCR 1244) or Rwanda?
- Kosovo (UNSCR 1244), at 4 1=low to 6=high against 4 1=low to 6=high in Rwanda as of 2025.
- What is the difference in cpia financial sector rating between Kosovo (UNSCR 1244) and Rwanda?
- 0 1=low to 6=high, with Kosovo (UNSCR 1244) ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Kosovo (UNSCR 1244) and Rwanda?
- 17 years are reported by both, from 2009 to 2025.
- How do Kosovo (UNSCR 1244) and Rwanda rank globally for cpia financial sector rating?
- Kosovo (UNSCR 1244) ranks 1st and Rwanda ranks 1st of 85 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- CPIA database, World Bank Group (WBG), published as CPIA financial sector rating (1=low to 6=high). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The CPIA measures the extent to which a country’s policy and institutional framework supports sustainable growth and poverty reduction, and consequently the effective use of development assistance. The outcome of the exercise yields both an overall score and scores for sixteen criteria that compose the CPIA. These criteria include: A. Economic Management (1. Monetary and Exchange Rate Policies; 2. Fiscal Policy; 3. Debt Policy and Management), B. Structural Policies (4. Trade; 5. Financial Sector; 6. Business Regulatory Environment), C. Policies for Social Inclusion/Equity (7. Gender equality; 8. Equity of public resource use; 9. Building human resources; 10. Social protection and labor; 11. Policies and institutions for environmental sustainability), D. Public Sector Management and Institutions (12. Property rights and rule-based governance; 13. Quality of budgetary and financial management; 14. Efficiency of revenue mobilization; 15. Quality of public administration; 16. Transparency, accountability, and corruption in the public sector). The financial sector criterion assesses the policies and regulations that affect financial sector development. Three dimensions are covered: (a) financial stability; (b) the sector’s efficiency, depth, and resource mobilization strength; and (c) access to financial services.