Mongolia vs Tuvalu: CPIA fiscal policy rating
CPIA fiscal policy rating over time
- Mongolia
- Tuvalu
How they compare
Mongolia currently reports 3 1=low to 6=high against 3 1=low to 6=high in Tuvalu, a difference of 0 1=low to 6=high.
Across all 8 years both countries report, Tuvalu has been ahead every year.
Mongolia ranks 44th and Tuvalu ranks 44th of 84 countries.
Tuvalu has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher cpia fiscal policy rating, Mongolia or Tuvalu?
- Mongolia, at 3 1=low to 6=high against 3 1=low to 6=high in Tuvalu as of 2019.
- What is the difference in cpia fiscal policy rating between Mongolia and Tuvalu?
- 0 1=low to 6=high, with Mongolia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Mongolia and Tuvalu?
- 8 years are reported by both, from 2012 to 2019.
- How do Mongolia and Tuvalu rank globally for cpia fiscal policy rating?
- Mongolia ranks 44th and Tuvalu ranks 44th of 84 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- CPIA database, World Bank Group (WBG), published as CPIA fiscal policy rating (1=low to 6=high). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The CPIA measures the extent to which a country’s policy and institutional framework supports sustainable growth and poverty reduction, and consequently the effective use of development assistance. The outcome of the exercise yields both an overall score and scores for sixteen criteria that compose the CPIA. These criteria include: A. Economic Management (1. Monetary and Exchange Rate Policies; 2. Fiscal Policy; 3. Debt Policy and Management), B. Structural Policies (4. Trade; 5. Financial Sector; 6. Business Regulatory Environment), C. Policies for Social Inclusion/Equity (7. Gender equality; 8. Equity of public resource use; 9. Building human resources; 10. Social protection and labor; 11. Policies and institutions for environmental sustainability), D. Public Sector Management and Institutions (12. Property rights and rule-based governance; 13. Quality of budgetary and financial management; 14. Efficiency of revenue mobilization; 15. Quality of public administration; 16. Transparency, accountability, and corruption in the public sector). This CPIA fiscal policy criterion assesses the quality of the fiscal policy in its stabilization and allocation functions. The stabilization function deals with achieving macroeconomic policy objectives in conjunction with coherent monetary and exchange rate policies—smoothing business cycle fluctuations, accommodating shocks. The allocation function is concerned with the appropriate provision of public goods. The criterion pays attention to public expenditure composition, including, for example, the provision of public infrastructure and agriculture related public goods and services that support medium-term growth.