Papua New Guinea vs Senegal: CPIA fiscal policy rating
CPIA fiscal policy rating over time
- Papua New Guinea
- Senegal
How they compare
Papua New Guinea currently reports 2.5 1=low to 6=high against 2.5 1=low to 6=high in Senegal, a difference of 0 1=low to 6=high.
Across all 21 years both countries report, Senegal has been ahead every year.
Papua New Guinea ranks 58th and Senegal ranks 58th of 85 countries.
Senegal has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Papua New Guinea | Senegal | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 3.4 1=low to 6=high | 3.9 1=low to 6=high | 0.5 1=low to 6=high | Senegal |
| 2010s | 2.7 1=low to 6=high | 3.9 1=low to 6=high | 1.2 1=low to 6=high | Senegal |
| 2020s | 2.5 1=low to 6=high | 3 1=low to 6=high | 0.5 1=low to 6=high | Senegal |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher cpia fiscal policy rating, Papua New Guinea or Senegal?
- Papua New Guinea, at 2.5 1=low to 6=high against 2.5 1=low to 6=high in Senegal as of 2025.
- What is the difference in cpia fiscal policy rating between Papua New Guinea and Senegal?
- 0 1=low to 6=high, with Papua New Guinea ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Papua New Guinea and Senegal?
- 21 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2025.
- How do Papua New Guinea and Senegal rank globally for cpia fiscal policy rating?
- Papua New Guinea ranks 58th and Senegal ranks 58th of 85 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- CPIA database, World Bank Group (WBG), published as CPIA fiscal policy rating (1=low to 6=high). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The CPIA measures the extent to which a country’s policy and institutional framework supports sustainable growth and poverty reduction, and consequently the effective use of development assistance. The outcome of the exercise yields both an overall score and scores for sixteen criteria that compose the CPIA. These criteria include: A. Economic Management (1. Monetary and Exchange Rate Policies; 2. Fiscal Policy; 3. Debt Policy and Management), B. Structural Policies (4. Trade; 5. Financial Sector; 6. Business Regulatory Environment), C. Policies for Social Inclusion/Equity (7. Gender equality; 8. Equity of public resource use; 9. Building human resources; 10. Social protection and labor; 11. Policies and institutions for environmental sustainability), D. Public Sector Management and Institutions (12. Property rights and rule-based governance; 13. Quality of budgetary and financial management; 14. Efficiency of revenue mobilization; 15. Quality of public administration; 16. Transparency, accountability, and corruption in the public sector). This CPIA fiscal policy criterion assesses the quality of the fiscal policy in its stabilization and allocation functions. The stabilization function deals with achieving macroeconomic policy objectives in conjunction with coherent monetary and exchange rate policies—smoothing business cycle fluctuations, accommodating shocks. The allocation function is concerned with the appropriate provision of public goods. The criterion pays attention to public expenditure composition, including, for example, the provision of public infrastructure and agriculture related public goods and services that support medium-term growth.