Africa Eastern and Southern vs Bosnia and Herzegovina: CPIA policies for social inclusion/equity cluster average
CPIA policies for social inclusion/equity cluster average over time
- Africa Eastern and Southern
- Bosnia and Herzegovina
How they compare
Bosnia and Herzegovina currently reports 3.6 1=low to 6=high against 3.25 1=low to 6=high in Africa Eastern and Southern, a difference of 0.35 1=low to 6=high.
That makes Bosnia and Herzegovina's figure about 1.1 times Africa Eastern and Southern's.
Across all 9 years both countries report, Bosnia and Herzegovina has been ahead every year.
Africa Eastern and Southern ranks 30th and Bosnia and Herzegovina ranks 28th of 42 groups.
Bosnia and Herzegovina has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Africa Eastern and Southern | Bosnia and Herzegovina | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 3.16 1=low to 6=high | 3.58 1=low to 6=high | 0.4233 1=low to 6=high | Bosnia and Herzegovina |
| 2010s | 3.19 1=low to 6=high | 3.62 1=low to 6=high | 0.4327 1=low to 6=high | Bosnia and Herzegovina |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher cpia policies for social inclusion/equity cluster average, Africa Eastern and Southern or Bosnia and Herzegovina?
- Bosnia and Herzegovina, at 3.6 1=low to 6=high against 3.25 1=low to 6=high in Africa Eastern and Southern as of 2013.
- What is the difference in cpia policies for social inclusion/equity cluster average between Africa Eastern and Southern and Bosnia and Herzegovina?
- 0.35 1=low to 6=high, with Bosnia and Herzegovina ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Africa Eastern and Southern and Bosnia and Herzegovina?
- 9 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2013.
- How do Africa Eastern and Southern and Bosnia and Herzegovina rank globally for cpia policies for social inclusion/equity cluster average?
- Africa Eastern and Southern ranks 30th and Bosnia and Herzegovina ranks 28th of 42 groups.
- Where does this data come from?
- CPIA database, World Bank Group (WBG), published as CPIA policies for social inclusion/equity cluster average (1=low to 6=high). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Country Policy and Institutional Assessment (CPIA) measures the extent to which a country’s policy and institutional framework supports sustainable growth and poverty reduction, and consequently the effective use of development assistance. The outcome of the exercise yields both an overall score and scores for sixteen criteria that compose the CPIA. These criteria include: A. Economic Management (1. Monetary and Exchange Rate Policies; 2. Fiscal Policy; 3. Debt Policy and Management), B. Structural Policies (4. Trade; 5. Financial Sector; 6. Business Regulatory Environment), C. Policies for Social Inclusion/Equity (7. Gender equality; 8. Equity of public resource use; 9. Building human resources; 10. Social protection and labor; 11. Policies and institutions for environmental sustainability), D. Public Sector Management and Institutions (12. Property rights and rule-based governance; 13. Quality of budgetary and financial management; 14. Efficiency of revenue mobilization; 15. Quality of public administration; 16. Transparency, accountability, and corruption in the public sector). The Policies for Social Inclusion and Equity cluster includes gender equality, equity of public resource use, building human resources, social protection and labor, and policies and institutions for environmental sustainability.