Angola vs Solomon Islands: CPIA policies for social inclusion/equity cluster average
CPIA policies for social inclusion/equity cluster average over time
- Angola
- Solomon Islands
How they compare
Solomon Islands currently reports 2.8 1=low to 6=high against 2.7 1=low to 6=high in Angola, a difference of 0.1 1=low to 6=high.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 9 shared years of data; in 2005 it was Solomon Islands ahead.
Angola ranks 73rd and Solomon Islands ranks 71st of 85 countries.
Angola has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Angola | Solomon Islands | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 2.72 1=low to 6=high | 2.62 1=low to 6=high | 0.1 1=low to 6=high | Angola |
| 2010s | 2.75 1=low to 6=high | 2.65 1=low to 6=high | 0.1 1=low to 6=high | Angola |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher cpia policies for social inclusion/equity cluster average, Angola or Solomon Islands?
- Solomon Islands, at 2.8 1=low to 6=high against 2.7 1=low to 6=high in Angola as of 2025.
- What is the difference in cpia policies for social inclusion/equity cluster average between Angola and Solomon Islands?
- 0.1 1=low to 6=high, with Solomon Islands ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Angola and Solomon Islands?
- 9 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2013.
- How do Angola and Solomon Islands rank globally for cpia policies for social inclusion/equity cluster average?
- Angola ranks 73rd and Solomon Islands ranks 71st of 85 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- CPIA database, World Bank Group (WBG), published as CPIA policies for social inclusion/equity cluster average (1=low to 6=high). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Country Policy and Institutional Assessment (CPIA) measures the extent to which a country’s policy and institutional framework supports sustainable growth and poverty reduction, and consequently the effective use of development assistance. The outcome of the exercise yields both an overall score and scores for sixteen criteria that compose the CPIA. These criteria include: A. Economic Management (1. Monetary and Exchange Rate Policies; 2. Fiscal Policy; 3. Debt Policy and Management), B. Structural Policies (4. Trade; 5. Financial Sector; 6. Business Regulatory Environment), C. Policies for Social Inclusion/Equity (7. Gender equality; 8. Equity of public resource use; 9. Building human resources; 10. Social protection and labor; 11. Policies and institutions for environmental sustainability), D. Public Sector Management and Institutions (12. Property rights and rule-based governance; 13. Quality of budgetary and financial management; 14. Efficiency of revenue mobilization; 15. Quality of public administration; 16. Transparency, accountability, and corruption in the public sector). The Policies for Social Inclusion and Equity cluster includes gender equality, equity of public resource use, building human resources, social protection and labor, and policies and institutions for environmental sustainability.