Azerbaijan vs Latin America & Caribbean (excluding high income): CPIA policies for social inclusion/equity cluster average

Azerbaijan
3.8 1=low to 6=high
in 2010
Latin America & Caribbean (excluding high income)
3.38 1=low to 6=high
in 2025
Azerbaijan rank
15th
Latin America & Caribbean (excluding high income) rank
16th

CPIA policies for social inclusion/equity cluster average over time

  • Azerbaijan
  • Latin America & Caribbean (excluding high income)
01234200520152025

How they compare

Azerbaijan currently reports 3.8 1=low to 6=high against 3.38 1=low to 6=high in Latin America & Caribbean (excluding high income), a difference of 0.42 1=low to 6=high.

That makes Azerbaijan's figure about 1.1 times Latin America & Caribbean (excluding high income)'s.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 6 shared years of data; in 2005 it was Latin America & Caribbean (excluding high income) ahead.

Azerbaijan ranks 15th and Latin America & Caribbean (excluding high income) ranks 16th of 85 countries.

Azerbaijan has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Azerbaijan Latin America & Caribbean (excluding high income) Difference Ahead
2000s 3.66 1=low to 6=high 3.6 1=low to 6=high 0.0571 1=low to 6=high Azerbaijan
2010s 3.8 1=low to 6=high 3.58 1=low to 6=high 0.225 1=low to 6=high Azerbaijan

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher cpia policies for social inclusion/equity cluster average, Azerbaijan or Latin America & Caribbean (excluding high income)?
Azerbaijan, at 3.8 1=low to 6=high against 3.38 1=low to 6=high in Latin America & Caribbean (excluding high income) as of 2010.
What is the difference in cpia policies for social inclusion/equity cluster average between Azerbaijan and Latin America & Caribbean (excluding high income)?
0.42 1=low to 6=high, with Azerbaijan ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Azerbaijan and Latin America & Caribbean (excluding high income)?
6 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2010.
How do Azerbaijan and Latin America & Caribbean (excluding high income) rank globally for cpia policies for social inclusion/equity cluster average?
Azerbaijan ranks 15th and Latin America & Caribbean (excluding high income) ranks 16th of 85 countries.
Where does this data come from?
CPIA database, World Bank Group (WBG), published as CPIA policies for social inclusion/equity cluster average (1=low to 6=high). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Azerbaijan vs Latin America & Caribbean (excluding high income): CPIA policies for social inclusion/equity cluster average. Statizoid, drawing on CPIA database, World Bank Group (WBG). Retrieved 16 September 2026, from https://public-sector.statizoid.com/compare/cpia-policies-for-social-inclusion-equity-cluster-average-1-low-to-6-high/azerbaijan/latin-america-and-caribbean-excluding-high-income/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://public-sector.statizoid.com/compare/cpia-policies-for-social-inclusion-equity-cluster-average-1-low-to-6-high/azerbaijan/latin-america-and-caribbean-excluding-high-income/">Azerbaijan vs Latin America & Caribbean (excluding high income): CPIA policies for social inclusion/equity cluster average</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
CPIA policies for social inclusion/equity cluster average (1=low to 6=high)
Unit
1=low to 6=high
Source
CPIA database, World Bank Group (WBG)
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
127 places, 2,457 data points, 2005–2025
Last refreshed

The Country Policy and Institutional Assessment (CPIA) measures the extent to which a country’s policy and institutional framework supports sustainable growth and poverty reduction, and consequently the effective use of development assistance. The outcome of the exercise yields both an overall score and scores for sixteen criteria that compose the CPIA. These criteria include: A. Economic Management (1. Monetary and Exchange Rate Policies; 2. Fiscal Policy; 3. Debt Policy and Management), B. Structural Policies (4. Trade; 5. Financial Sector; 6. Business Regulatory Environment), C. Policies for Social Inclusion/Equity (7. Gender equality; 8. Equity of public resource use; 9. Building human resources; 10. Social protection and labor; 11. Policies and institutions for environmental sustainability), D. Public Sector Management and Institutions (12. Property rights and rule-based governance; 13. Quality of budgetary and financial management; 14. Efficiency of revenue mobilization; 15. Quality of public administration; 16. Transparency, accountability, and corruption in the public sector). The Policies for Social Inclusion and Equity cluster includes gender equality, equity of public resource use, building human resources, social protection and labor, and policies and institutions for environmental sustainability.