Early-demographic dividend vs India: CPIA policies for social inclusion/equity cluster average
CPIA policies for social inclusion/equity cluster average over time
- Early-demographic dividend
- India
How they compare
India currently reports 3.7 1=low to 6=high against 3.31 1=low to 6=high in Early-demographic dividend, a difference of 0.39 1=low to 6=high.
That makes India's figure about 1.1 times Early-demographic dividend's.
Across all 9 years both countries report, India has been ahead every year.
Early-demographic dividend ranks 23rd and India ranks 22nd of 42 groups.
India has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Early-demographic dividend | India | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 3.37 1=low to 6=high | 3.7 1=low to 6=high | 0.3348 1=low to 6=high | India |
| 2010s | 3.43 1=low to 6=high | 3.68 1=low to 6=high | 0.2497 1=low to 6=high | India |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher cpia policies for social inclusion/equity cluster average, Early-demographic dividend or India?
- India, at 3.7 1=low to 6=high against 3.31 1=low to 6=high in Early-demographic dividend as of 2013.
- What is the difference in cpia policies for social inclusion/equity cluster average between Early-demographic dividend and India?
- 0.39 1=low to 6=high, with India ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Early-demographic dividend and India?
- 9 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2013.
- How do Early-demographic dividend and India rank globally for cpia policies for social inclusion/equity cluster average?
- Early-demographic dividend ranks 23rd and India ranks 22nd of 42 groups.
- Where does this data come from?
- CPIA database, World Bank Group (WBG), published as CPIA policies for social inclusion/equity cluster average (1=low to 6=high). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Country Policy and Institutional Assessment (CPIA) measures the extent to which a country’s policy and institutional framework supports sustainable growth and poverty reduction, and consequently the effective use of development assistance. The outcome of the exercise yields both an overall score and scores for sixteen criteria that compose the CPIA. These criteria include: A. Economic Management (1. Monetary and Exchange Rate Policies; 2. Fiscal Policy; 3. Debt Policy and Management), B. Structural Policies (4. Trade; 5. Financial Sector; 6. Business Regulatory Environment), C. Policies for Social Inclusion/Equity (7. Gender equality; 8. Equity of public resource use; 9. Building human resources; 10. Social protection and labor; 11. Policies and institutions for environmental sustainability), D. Public Sector Management and Institutions (12. Property rights and rule-based governance; 13. Quality of budgetary and financial management; 14. Efficiency of revenue mobilization; 15. Quality of public administration; 16. Transparency, accountability, and corruption in the public sector). The Policies for Social Inclusion and Equity cluster includes gender equality, equity of public resource use, building human resources, social protection and labor, and policies and institutions for environmental sustainability.