Eritrea vs Micronesia, Federated States of: CPIA policies for social inclusion/equity cluster average
CPIA policies for social inclusion/equity cluster average over time
- Eritrea
- Micronesia, Federated States of
How they compare
Micronesia, Federated States of currently reports 2.7 1=low to 6=high against 2.6 1=low to 6=high in Eritrea, a difference of 0.1 1=low to 6=high.
Across all 15 years both countries report, Micronesia, Federated States of has been ahead every year.
Eritrea ranks 76th and Micronesia, Federated States of ranks 73rd of 85 countries.
Micronesia, Federated States of has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Eritrea | Micronesia, Federated States of | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 2.6 1=low to 6=high | 2.66 1=low to 6=high | 0.0556 1=low to 6=high | Micronesia, Federated States of |
| 2020s | 2.6 1=low to 6=high | 2.7 1=low to 6=high | 0.1 1=low to 6=high | Micronesia, Federated States of |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher cpia policies for social inclusion/equity cluster average, Eritrea or Micronesia, Federated States of?
- Micronesia, Federated States of, at 2.7 1=low to 6=high against 2.6 1=low to 6=high in Eritrea as of 2025.
- What is the difference in cpia policies for social inclusion/equity cluster average between Eritrea and Micronesia, Federated States of?
- 0.1 1=low to 6=high, with Micronesia, Federated States of ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Eritrea and Micronesia, Federated States of?
- 15 years are reported by both, from 2011 to 2025.
- How do Eritrea and Micronesia, Federated States of rank globally for cpia policies for social inclusion/equity cluster average?
- Eritrea ranks 76th and Micronesia, Federated States of ranks 73rd of 85 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- CPIA database, World Bank Group (WBG), published as CPIA policies for social inclusion/equity cluster average (1=low to 6=high). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Country Policy and Institutional Assessment (CPIA) measures the extent to which a country’s policy and institutional framework supports sustainable growth and poverty reduction, and consequently the effective use of development assistance. The outcome of the exercise yields both an overall score and scores for sixteen criteria that compose the CPIA. These criteria include: A. Economic Management (1. Monetary and Exchange Rate Policies; 2. Fiscal Policy; 3. Debt Policy and Management), B. Structural Policies (4. Trade; 5. Financial Sector; 6. Business Regulatory Environment), C. Policies for Social Inclusion/Equity (7. Gender equality; 8. Equity of public resource use; 9. Building human resources; 10. Social protection and labor; 11. Policies and institutions for environmental sustainability), D. Public Sector Management and Institutions (12. Property rights and rule-based governance; 13. Quality of budgetary and financial management; 14. Efficiency of revenue mobilization; 15. Quality of public administration; 16. Transparency, accountability, and corruption in the public sector). The Policies for Social Inclusion and Equity cluster includes gender equality, equity of public resource use, building human resources, social protection and labor, and policies and institutions for environmental sustainability.