IDA only vs Tajikistan: CPIA policies for social inclusion/equity cluster average
CPIA policies for social inclusion/equity cluster average over time
- IDA only
- Tajikistan
How they compare
Tajikistan currently reports 3.5 1=low to 6=high against 3.22 1=low to 6=high in IDA only, a difference of 0.28 1=low to 6=high.
That makes Tajikistan's figure about 1.1 times IDA only's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 21 shared years of data; in 2005 it was IDA only ahead.
IDA only ranks 31st and Tajikistan ranks 33rd of 42 groups.
Tajikistan has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | IDA only | Tajikistan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 3.24 1=low to 6=high | 3.24 1=low to 6=high | 0.0026 1=low to 6=high | Tajikistan |
| 2010s | 3.23 1=low to 6=high | 3.42 1=low to 6=high | 0.1932 1=low to 6=high | Tajikistan |
| 2020s | 3.23 1=low to 6=high | 3.47 1=low to 6=high | 0.2375 1=low to 6=high | Tajikistan |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher cpia policies for social inclusion/equity cluster average, IDA only or Tajikistan?
- Tajikistan, at 3.5 1=low to 6=high against 3.22 1=low to 6=high in IDA only as of 2025.
- What is the difference in cpia policies for social inclusion/equity cluster average between IDA only and Tajikistan?
- 0.28 1=low to 6=high, with Tajikistan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for IDA only and Tajikistan?
- 21 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2025.
- How do IDA only and Tajikistan rank globally for cpia policies for social inclusion/equity cluster average?
- IDA only ranks 31st and Tajikistan ranks 33rd of 42 groups.
- Where does this data come from?
- CPIA database, World Bank Group (WBG), published as CPIA policies for social inclusion/equity cluster average (1=low to 6=high). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Country Policy and Institutional Assessment (CPIA) measures the extent to which a country’s policy and institutional framework supports sustainable growth and poverty reduction, and consequently the effective use of development assistance. The outcome of the exercise yields both an overall score and scores for sixteen criteria that compose the CPIA. These criteria include: A. Economic Management (1. Monetary and Exchange Rate Policies; 2. Fiscal Policy; 3. Debt Policy and Management), B. Structural Policies (4. Trade; 5. Financial Sector; 6. Business Regulatory Environment), C. Policies for Social Inclusion/Equity (7. Gender equality; 8. Equity of public resource use; 9. Building human resources; 10. Social protection and labor; 11. Policies and institutions for environmental sustainability), D. Public Sector Management and Institutions (12. Property rights and rule-based governance; 13. Quality of budgetary and financial management; 14. Efficiency of revenue mobilization; 15. Quality of public administration; 16. Transparency, accountability, and corruption in the public sector). The Policies for Social Inclusion and Equity cluster includes gender equality, equity of public resource use, building human resources, social protection and labor, and policies and institutions for environmental sustainability.