Latin America & Caribbean vs Mongolia: CPIA policies for social inclusion/equity cluster average
CPIA policies for social inclusion/equity cluster average over time
- Latin America & Caribbean
- Mongolia
How they compare
Mongolia currently reports 3.8 1=low to 6=high against 3.37 1=low to 6=high in Latin America & Caribbean, a difference of 0.43 1=low to 6=high.
That makes Mongolia's figure about 1.1 times Latin America & Caribbean's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 15 shared years of data; in 2005 it was Latin America & Caribbean ahead.
Latin America & Caribbean ranks 18th and Mongolia ranks 15th of 42 groups.
Across the 2 decades both report, Latin America & Caribbean averaged higher in 1 and Mongolia in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Latin America & Caribbean | Mongolia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 3.58 1=low to 6=high | 3.38 1=low to 6=high | 0.2006 1=low to 6=high | Latin America & Caribbean |
| 2010s | 3.5 1=low to 6=high | 3.68 1=low to 6=high | 0.1797 1=low to 6=high | Mongolia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher cpia policies for social inclusion/equity cluster average, Latin America & Caribbean or Mongolia?
- Mongolia, at 3.8 1=low to 6=high against 3.37 1=low to 6=high in Latin America & Caribbean as of 2019.
- What is the difference in cpia policies for social inclusion/equity cluster average between Latin America & Caribbean and Mongolia?
- 0.43 1=low to 6=high, with Mongolia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Latin America & Caribbean and Mongolia?
- 15 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2019.
- How do Latin America & Caribbean and Mongolia rank globally for cpia policies for social inclusion/equity cluster average?
- Latin America & Caribbean ranks 18th and Mongolia ranks 15th of 42 groups.
- Where does this data come from?
- CPIA database, World Bank Group (WBG), published as CPIA policies for social inclusion/equity cluster average (1=low to 6=high). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Country Policy and Institutional Assessment (CPIA) measures the extent to which a country’s policy and institutional framework supports sustainable growth and poverty reduction, and consequently the effective use of development assistance. The outcome of the exercise yields both an overall score and scores for sixteen criteria that compose the CPIA. These criteria include: A. Economic Management (1. Monetary and Exchange Rate Policies; 2. Fiscal Policy; 3. Debt Policy and Management), B. Structural Policies (4. Trade; 5. Financial Sector; 6. Business Regulatory Environment), C. Policies for Social Inclusion/Equity (7. Gender equality; 8. Equity of public resource use; 9. Building human resources; 10. Social protection and labor; 11. Policies and institutions for environmental sustainability), D. Public Sector Management and Institutions (12. Property rights and rule-based governance; 13. Quality of budgetary and financial management; 14. Efficiency of revenue mobilization; 15. Quality of public administration; 16. Transparency, accountability, and corruption in the public sector). The Policies for Social Inclusion and Equity cluster includes gender equality, equity of public resource use, building human resources, social protection and labor, and policies and institutions for environmental sustainability.