Least developed countries vs Lesotho: CPIA policies for social inclusion/equity cluster average
CPIA policies for social inclusion/equity cluster average over time
- Least developed countries
- Lesotho
How they compare
Lesotho currently reports 3.5 1=low to 6=high against 3.16 1=low to 6=high in Least developed countries, a difference of 0.34 1=low to 6=high.
That makes Lesotho's figure about 1.1 times Least developed countries's.
Across all 21 years both countries report, Lesotho has been ahead every year.
Least developed countries ranks 34th and Lesotho ranks 33rd of 42 groups.
Lesotho has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Least developed countries | Lesotho | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 3.11 1=low to 6=high | 3.34 1=low to 6=high | 0.2265 1=low to 6=high | Lesotho |
| 2010s | 3.14 1=low to 6=high | 3.39 1=low to 6=high | 0.2525 1=low to 6=high | Lesotho |
| 2020s | 3.15 1=low to 6=high | 3.5 1=low to 6=high | 0.3498 1=low to 6=high | Lesotho |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher cpia policies for social inclusion/equity cluster average, Least developed countries or Lesotho?
- Lesotho, at 3.5 1=low to 6=high against 3.16 1=low to 6=high in Least developed countries as of 2025.
- What is the difference in cpia policies for social inclusion/equity cluster average between Least developed countries and Lesotho?
- 0.34 1=low to 6=high, with Lesotho ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Least developed countries and Lesotho?
- 21 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2025.
- How do Least developed countries and Lesotho rank globally for cpia policies for social inclusion/equity cluster average?
- Least developed countries ranks 34th and Lesotho ranks 33rd of 42 groups.
- Where does this data come from?
- CPIA database, World Bank Group (WBG), published as CPIA policies for social inclusion/equity cluster average (1=low to 6=high). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Country Policy and Institutional Assessment (CPIA) measures the extent to which a country’s policy and institutional framework supports sustainable growth and poverty reduction, and consequently the effective use of development assistance. The outcome of the exercise yields both an overall score and scores for sixteen criteria that compose the CPIA. These criteria include: A. Economic Management (1. Monetary and Exchange Rate Policies; 2. Fiscal Policy; 3. Debt Policy and Management), B. Structural Policies (4. Trade; 5. Financial Sector; 6. Business Regulatory Environment), C. Policies for Social Inclusion/Equity (7. Gender equality; 8. Equity of public resource use; 9. Building human resources; 10. Social protection and labor; 11. Policies and institutions for environmental sustainability), D. Public Sector Management and Institutions (12. Property rights and rule-based governance; 13. Quality of budgetary and financial management; 14. Efficiency of revenue mobilization; 15. Quality of public administration; 16. Transparency, accountability, and corruption in the public sector). The Policies for Social Inclusion and Equity cluster includes gender equality, equity of public resource use, building human resources, social protection and labor, and policies and institutions for environmental sustainability.