Myanmar vs Somalia: CPIA policies for social inclusion/equity cluster average
CPIA policies for social inclusion/equity cluster average over time
- Myanmar
- Somalia
How they compare
Somalia currently reports 2.5 1=low to 6=high against 2.1 1=low to 6=high in Myanmar, a difference of 0.4 1=low to 6=high.
That makes Somalia's figure about 1.2 times Myanmar's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 8 shared years of data; in 2017 it was Myanmar ahead.
Myanmar ranks 82nd and Somalia ranks 79th of 85 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Myanmar averaged higher in 1 and Somalia in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Myanmar | Somalia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 2.6 1=low to 6=high | 2.2 1=low to 6=high | 0.4 1=low to 6=high | Myanmar |
| 2020s | 2.33 1=low to 6=high | 2.45 1=low to 6=high | 0.1167 1=low to 6=high | Somalia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher cpia policies for social inclusion/equity cluster average, Myanmar or Somalia?
- Somalia, at 2.5 1=low to 6=high against 2.1 1=low to 6=high in Myanmar as of 2025.
- What is the difference in cpia policies for social inclusion/equity cluster average between Myanmar and Somalia?
- 0.4 1=low to 6=high, with Somalia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Myanmar and Somalia?
- 8 years are reported by both, from 2017 to 2025.
- How do Myanmar and Somalia rank globally for cpia policies for social inclusion/equity cluster average?
- Myanmar ranks 82nd and Somalia ranks 79th of 85 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- CPIA database, World Bank Group (WBG), published as CPIA policies for social inclusion/equity cluster average (1=low to 6=high). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Country Policy and Institutional Assessment (CPIA) measures the extent to which a country’s policy and institutional framework supports sustainable growth and poverty reduction, and consequently the effective use of development assistance. The outcome of the exercise yields both an overall score and scores for sixteen criteria that compose the CPIA. These criteria include: A. Economic Management (1. Monetary and Exchange Rate Policies; 2. Fiscal Policy; 3. Debt Policy and Management), B. Structural Policies (4. Trade; 5. Financial Sector; 6. Business Regulatory Environment), C. Policies for Social Inclusion/Equity (7. Gender equality; 8. Equity of public resource use; 9. Building human resources; 10. Social protection and labor; 11. Policies and institutions for environmental sustainability), D. Public Sector Management and Institutions (12. Property rights and rule-based governance; 13. Quality of budgetary and financial management; 14. Efficiency of revenue mobilization; 15. Quality of public administration; 16. Transparency, accountability, and corruption in the public sector). The Policies for Social Inclusion and Equity cluster includes gender equality, equity of public resource use, building human resources, social protection and labor, and policies and institutions for environmental sustainability.