Papua New Guinea vs East Timor: CPIA policies for social inclusion/equity cluster average (1=low)
CPIA policies for social inclusion/equity cluster average (1=low) over time
- Papua New Guinea
- East Timor
How they compare
East Timor currently reports 2.8 1=low to 6=high against 2.7 1=low to 6=high in Papua New Guinea, a difference of 0.1 1=low to 6=high.
Across all 20 years both countries report, East Timor has been ahead every year.
Papua New Guinea ranks 73rd and East Timor ranks 71st of 85 countries.
East Timor has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Papua New Guinea | East Timor | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 2.62 1=low to 6=high | 2.7 1=low to 6=high | 0.075 1=low to 6=high | East Timor |
| 2010s | 2.64 1=low to 6=high | 2.9 1=low to 6=high | 0.26 1=low to 6=high | East Timor |
| 2020s | 2.6 1=low to 6=high | 2.88 1=low to 6=high | 0.2833 1=low to 6=high | East Timor |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher cpia policies for social inclusion/equity cluster average, Papua New Guinea or East Timor?
- East Timor, at 2.8 1=low to 6=high against 2.7 1=low to 6=high in Papua New Guinea as of 2025.
- What is the difference in cpia policies for social inclusion/equity cluster average between Papua New Guinea and East Timor?
- 0.1 1=low to 6=high, with East Timor ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Papua New Guinea and East Timor?
- 20 years are reported by both, from 2006 to 2025.
- How do Papua New Guinea and East Timor rank globally for cpia policies for social inclusion/equity cluster average?
- Papua New Guinea ranks 73rd and East Timor ranks 71st of 85 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- CPIA database, World Bank Group (WBG), published as CPIA policies for social inclusion/equity cluster average (1=low to 6=high). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Country Policy and Institutional Assessment (CPIA) measures the extent to which a country’s policy and institutional framework supports sustainable growth and poverty reduction, and consequently the effective use of development assistance. The outcome of the exercise yields both an overall score and scores for sixteen criteria that compose the CPIA. These criteria include: A. Economic Management (1. Monetary and Exchange Rate Policies; 2. Fiscal Policy; 3. Debt Policy and Management), B. Structural Policies (4. Trade; 5. Financial Sector; 6. Business Regulatory Environment), C. Policies for Social Inclusion/Equity (7. Gender equality; 8. Equity of public resource use; 9. Building human resources; 10. Social protection and labor; 11. Policies and institutions for environmental sustainability), D. Public Sector Management and Institutions (12. Property rights and rule-based governance; 13. Quality of budgetary and financial management; 14. Efficiency of revenue mobilization; 15. Quality of public administration; 16. Transparency, accountability, and corruption in the public sector). The Policies for Social Inclusion and Equity cluster includes gender equality, equity of public resource use, building human resources, social protection and labor, and policies and institutions for environmental sustainability.