Post-demographic dividend vs Saint Lucia: CPIA policies for social inclusion/equity cluster average
CPIA policies for social inclusion/equity cluster average over time
- Post-demographic dividend
- Saint Lucia
How they compare
Saint Lucia currently reports 3.9 1=low to 6=high against 3.6 1=low to 6=high in Post-demographic dividend, a difference of 0.3 1=low to 6=high.
That makes Saint Lucia's figure about 1.1 times Post-demographic dividend's.
Across all 9 years both countries report, Saint Lucia has been ahead every year.
Post-demographic dividend ranks 8th and Saint Lucia ranks 11th of 42 groups.
Saint Lucia has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Post-demographic dividend | Saint Lucia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 3.58 1=low to 6=high | 3.78 1=low to 6=high | 0.2 1=low to 6=high | Saint Lucia |
| 2010s | 3.62 1=low to 6=high | 3.62 1=low to 6=high | 0 1=low to 6=high | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher cpia policies for social inclusion/equity cluster average, Post-demographic dividend or Saint Lucia?
- Saint Lucia, at 3.9 1=low to 6=high against 3.6 1=low to 6=high in Post-demographic dividend as of 2025.
- What is the difference in cpia policies for social inclusion/equity cluster average between Post-demographic dividend and Saint Lucia?
- 0.3 1=low to 6=high, with Saint Lucia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Post-demographic dividend and Saint Lucia?
- 9 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2013.
- How do Post-demographic dividend and Saint Lucia rank globally for cpia policies for social inclusion/equity cluster average?
- Post-demographic dividend ranks 8th and Saint Lucia ranks 11th of 42 groups.
- Where does this data come from?
- CPIA database, World Bank Group (WBG), published as CPIA policies for social inclusion/equity cluster average (1=low to 6=high). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Country Policy and Institutional Assessment (CPIA) measures the extent to which a country’s policy and institutional framework supports sustainable growth and poverty reduction, and consequently the effective use of development assistance. The outcome of the exercise yields both an overall score and scores for sixteen criteria that compose the CPIA. These criteria include: A. Economic Management (1. Monetary and Exchange Rate Policies; 2. Fiscal Policy; 3. Debt Policy and Management), B. Structural Policies (4. Trade; 5. Financial Sector; 6. Business Regulatory Environment), C. Policies for Social Inclusion/Equity (7. Gender equality; 8. Equity of public resource use; 9. Building human resources; 10. Social protection and labor; 11. Policies and institutions for environmental sustainability), D. Public Sector Management and Institutions (12. Property rights and rule-based governance; 13. Quality of budgetary and financial management; 14. Efficiency of revenue mobilization; 15. Quality of public administration; 16. Transparency, accountability, and corruption in the public sector). The Policies for Social Inclusion and Equity cluster includes gender equality, equity of public resource use, building human resources, social protection and labor, and policies and institutions for environmental sustainability.