Saint Lucia vs Upper middle income: CPIA policies for social inclusion/equity cluster average
CPIA policies for social inclusion/equity cluster average over time
- Saint Lucia
- Upper middle income
How they compare
Saint Lucia currently reports 3.9 1=low to 6=high against 3.48 1=low to 6=high in Upper middle income, a difference of 0.42 1=low to 6=high.
That makes Saint Lucia's figure about 1.1 times Upper middle income's.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 21 shared years of data; in 2005 it was Saint Lucia ahead.
Saint Lucia ranks 11th and Upper middle income ranks 11th of 85 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Saint Lucia averaged higher in 2 and Upper middle income in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Saint Lucia | Upper middle income | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 3.78 1=low to 6=high | 3.78 1=low to 6=high | 0.0008 1=low to 6=high | Upper middle income |
| 2010s | 3.71 1=low to 6=high | 3.54 1=low to 6=high | 0.1674 1=low to 6=high | Saint Lucia |
| 2020s | 3.9 1=low to 6=high | 3.49 1=low to 6=high | 0.4141 1=low to 6=high | Saint Lucia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher cpia policies for social inclusion/equity cluster average, Saint Lucia or Upper middle income?
- Saint Lucia, at 3.9 1=low to 6=high against 3.48 1=low to 6=high in Upper middle income as of 2025.
- What is the difference in cpia policies for social inclusion/equity cluster average between Saint Lucia and Upper middle income?
- 0.42 1=low to 6=high, with Saint Lucia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Saint Lucia and Upper middle income?
- 21 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2025.
- How do Saint Lucia and Upper middle income rank globally for cpia policies for social inclusion/equity cluster average?
- Saint Lucia ranks 11th and Upper middle income ranks 11th of 85 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- CPIA database, World Bank Group (WBG), published as CPIA policies for social inclusion/equity cluster average (1=low to 6=high). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Country Policy and Institutional Assessment (CPIA) measures the extent to which a country’s policy and institutional framework supports sustainable growth and poverty reduction, and consequently the effective use of development assistance. The outcome of the exercise yields both an overall score and scores for sixteen criteria that compose the CPIA. These criteria include: A. Economic Management (1. Monetary and Exchange Rate Policies; 2. Fiscal Policy; 3. Debt Policy and Management), B. Structural Policies (4. Trade; 5. Financial Sector; 6. Business Regulatory Environment), C. Policies for Social Inclusion/Equity (7. Gender equality; 8. Equity of public resource use; 9. Building human resources; 10. Social protection and labor; 11. Policies and institutions for environmental sustainability), D. Public Sector Management and Institutions (12. Property rights and rule-based governance; 13. Quality of budgetary and financial management; 14. Efficiency of revenue mobilization; 15. Quality of public administration; 16. Transparency, accountability, and corruption in the public sector). The Policies for Social Inclusion and Equity cluster includes gender equality, equity of public resource use, building human resources, social protection and labor, and policies and institutions for environmental sustainability.