Congo vs Latin America & Caribbean (excluding high income): CPIA quality of budgetary and financial management rating
CPIA quality of budgetary and financial management rating over time
- Congo
- Latin America & Caribbean (excluding high income)
How they compare
Congo currently reports 3 1=low to 6=high against 2.78 1=low to 6=high in Latin America & Caribbean (excluding high income), a difference of 0.22 1=low to 6=high.
That makes Congo's figure about 1.1 times Latin America & Caribbean (excluding high income)'s.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 21 shared years of data; in 2005 it was Latin America & Caribbean (excluding high income) ahead.
Congo ranks 36th and Latin America & Caribbean (excluding high income) ranks 35th of 85 countries.
Latin America & Caribbean (excluding high income) has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Congo | Latin America & Caribbean (excluding high income) | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 2.7 1=low to 6=high | 3.58 1=low to 6=high | 0.875 1=low to 6=high | Latin America & Caribbean (excluding high income) |
| 2010s | 2.55 1=low to 6=high | 3.25 1=low to 6=high | 0.6982 1=low to 6=high | Latin America & Caribbean (excluding high income) |
| 2020s | 2.83 1=low to 6=high | 2.93 1=low to 6=high | 0.0979 1=low to 6=high | Latin America & Caribbean (excluding high income) |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher cpia quality of budgetary and financial management rating, Congo or Latin America & Caribbean (excluding high income)?
- Congo, at 3 1=low to 6=high against 2.78 1=low to 6=high in Latin America & Caribbean (excluding high income) as of 2025.
- What is the difference in cpia quality of budgetary and financial management rating between Congo and Latin America & Caribbean (excluding high income)?
- 0.22 1=low to 6=high, with Congo ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Congo and Latin America & Caribbean (excluding high income)?
- 21 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2025.
- How do Congo and Latin America & Caribbean (excluding high income) rank globally for cpia quality of budgetary and financial management rating?
- Congo ranks 36th and Latin America & Caribbean (excluding high income) ranks 35th of 85 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- CPIA database, World Bank Group (WBG), published as CPIA quality of budgetary and financial management rating (1=low to 6=high). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The CPIA measures the extent to which a country’s policy and institutional framework supports sustainable growth and poverty reduction, and consequently the effective use of development assistance. The outcome of the exercise yields both an overall score and scores for sixteen criteria that compose the CPIA. These criteria include: A. Economic Management (1. Monetary and Exchange Rate Policies; 2. Fiscal Policy; 3. Debt Policy and Management), B. Structural Policies (4. Trade; 5. Financial Sector; 6. Business Regulatory Environment), C. Policies for Social Inclusion/Equity (7. Gender equality; 8. Equity of public resource use; 9. Building human resources; 10. Social protection and labor; 11. Policies and institutions for environmental sustainability), D. Public Sector Management and Institutions (12. Property rights and rule-based governance; 13. Quality of budgetary and financial management; 14. Efficiency of revenue mobilization; 15. Quality of public administration; 16. Transparency, accountability, and corruption in the public sector). The quality of budgetary and financial management criterion assesses the extent to which there is: (a) a comprehensive and credible budget, linked to policy priorities; (b) effective financial management systems to ensure that the budget is implemented as intended in a controlled and predictable way; and (c) timely and accurate accounting and fiscal reporting, including timely audit of public accounts and effective arrangements for follow up.