Eritrea vs South Sudan: CPIA quality of budgetary and financial management rating
CPIA quality of budgetary and financial management rating over time
- Eritrea
- South Sudan
How they compare
Eritrea currently reports 1 1=low to 6=high against 1 1=low to 6=high in South Sudan, a difference of 0 1=low to 6=high.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 14 shared years of data; in 2012 it was South Sudan ahead.
Eritrea ranks 82nd and South Sudan ranks 82nd of 85 countries.
Eritrea has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Eritrea | South Sudan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 2 1=low to 6=high | 1.44 1=low to 6=high | 0.5625 1=low to 6=high | Eritrea |
| 2020s | 1.25 1=low to 6=high | 1 1=low to 6=high | 0.25 1=low to 6=high | Eritrea |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher cpia quality of budgetary and financial management rating, Eritrea or South Sudan?
- Eritrea, at 1 1=low to 6=high against 1 1=low to 6=high in South Sudan as of 2025.
- What is the difference in cpia quality of budgetary and financial management rating between Eritrea and South Sudan?
- 0 1=low to 6=high, with Eritrea ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Eritrea and South Sudan?
- 14 years are reported by both, from 2012 to 2025.
- How do Eritrea and South Sudan rank globally for cpia quality of budgetary and financial management rating?
- Eritrea ranks 82nd and South Sudan ranks 82nd of 85 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- CPIA database, World Bank Group (WBG), published as CPIA quality of budgetary and financial management rating (1=low to 6=high). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The CPIA measures the extent to which a country’s policy and institutional framework supports sustainable growth and poverty reduction, and consequently the effective use of development assistance. The outcome of the exercise yields both an overall score and scores for sixteen criteria that compose the CPIA. These criteria include: A. Economic Management (1. Monetary and Exchange Rate Policies; 2. Fiscal Policy; 3. Debt Policy and Management), B. Structural Policies (4. Trade; 5. Financial Sector; 6. Business Regulatory Environment), C. Policies for Social Inclusion/Equity (7. Gender equality; 8. Equity of public resource use; 9. Building human resources; 10. Social protection and labor; 11. Policies and institutions for environmental sustainability), D. Public Sector Management and Institutions (12. Property rights and rule-based governance; 13. Quality of budgetary and financial management; 14. Efficiency of revenue mobilization; 15. Quality of public administration; 16. Transparency, accountability, and corruption in the public sector). The quality of budgetary and financial management criterion assesses the extent to which there is: (a) a comprehensive and credible budget, linked to policy priorities; (b) effective financial management systems to ensure that the budget is implemented as intended in a controlled and predictable way; and (c) timely and accurate accounting and fiscal reporting, including timely audit of public accounts and effective arrangements for follow up.