Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC) vs Kosovo (UNSCR 1244): CPIA quality of public administration rating
CPIA quality of public administration rating over time
- Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC)
- Kosovo (UNSCR 1244)
How they compare
Kosovo (UNSCR 1244) currently reports 3 1=low to 6=high against 2.75 1=low to 6=high in Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC), a difference of 0.25 1=low to 6=high.
That makes Kosovo (UNSCR 1244)'s figure about 1.1 times Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC)'s.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 17 shared years of data; in 2009 it was Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC) ahead.
Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC) ranks 30th and Kosovo (UNSCR 1244) ranks 28th of 42 groups.
Across the 3 decades both report, Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC) averaged higher in 1 and Kosovo (UNSCR 1244) in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC) | Kosovo (UNSCR 1244) | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 2.86 1=low to 6=high | 2.5 1=low to 6=high | 0.3553 1=low to 6=high | Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC) |
| 2010s | 2.84 1=low to 6=high | 2.95 1=low to 6=high | 0.1139 1=low to 6=high | Kosovo (UNSCR 1244) |
| 2020s | 2.8 1=low to 6=high | 3 1=low to 6=high | 0.2047 1=low to 6=high | Kosovo (UNSCR 1244) |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher cpia quality of public administration rating, Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC) or Kosovo (UNSCR 1244)?
- Kosovo (UNSCR 1244), at 3 1=low to 6=high against 2.75 1=low to 6=high in Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC) as of 2025.
- What is the difference in cpia quality of public administration rating between Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC) and Kosovo (UNSCR 1244)?
- 0.25 1=low to 6=high, with Kosovo (UNSCR 1244) ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC) and Kosovo (UNSCR 1244)?
- 17 years are reported by both, from 2009 to 2025.
- How do Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC) and Kosovo (UNSCR 1244) rank globally for cpia quality of public administration rating?
- Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC) ranks 30th and Kosovo (UNSCR 1244) ranks 28th of 42 groups.
- Where does this data come from?
- CPIA database, World Bank Group (WBG), published as CPIA quality of public administration rating (1=low to 6=high). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The CPIA measures the extent to which a country’s policy and institutional framework supports sustainable growth and poverty reduction, and consequently the effective use of development assistance. The outcome of the exercise yields both an overall score and scores for sixteen criteria that compose the CPIA. These criteria include: A. Economic Management (1. Monetary and Exchange Rate Policies; 2. Fiscal Policy; 3. Debt Policy and Management), B. Structural Policies (4. Trade; 5. Financial Sector; 6. Business Regulatory Environment), C. Policies for Social Inclusion/Equity (7. Gender equality; 8. Equity of public resource use; 9. Building human resources; 10. Social protection and labor; 11. Policies and institutions for environmental sustainability), D. Public Sector Management and Institutions (12. Property rights and rule-based governance; 13. Quality of budgetary and financial management; 14. Efficiency of revenue mobilization; 15. Quality of public administration; 16. Transparency, accountability, and corruption in the public sector). The CPIA Quality of Public Administration criterion covers the core administration defined as the civilian central government (and subnational governments, to the extent that their size or policy responsibilities are significant) excluding health and education personnel, and police. The criterion assesses the functioning of the core administration in three areas: (a) managing its own operations; (b) ensuring quality in policy implementation and regulatory management; and (c) coordinating the larger public sector Human Resources Management regime outside the core administration (de-concentrated and arms-length bodies and subsidiary governments).