Saint Vincent and the Grenadines vs Togo: CPIA social protection rating

Saint Vincent and the Grenadines
3.5 1=low to 6=high
in 2025
Togo
3.5 1=low to 6=high
in 2025
Saint Vincent and the Grenadines rank
10th
Togo rank
10th

CPIA social protection rating over time

  • Saint Vincent and the Grenadines
  • Togo
01234200520152025

How they compare

Saint Vincent and the Grenadines currently reports 3.5 1=low to 6=high against 3.5 1=low to 6=high in Togo, a difference of 0 1=low to 6=high.

The two have swapped places 5 times across 21 shared years of data; in 2005 it was Saint Vincent and the Grenadines ahead.

Saint Vincent and the Grenadines ranks 10th and Togo ranks 10th of 85 countries.

Saint Vincent and the Grenadines has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Saint Vincent and the Grenadines Togo Difference Ahead
2000s 3.2 1=low to 6=high 2.7 1=low to 6=high 0.5 1=low to 6=high Saint Vincent and the Grenadines
2010s 3.4 1=low to 6=high 3 1=low to 6=high 0.4 1=low to 6=high Saint Vincent and the Grenadines
2020s 3.5 1=low to 6=high 3.25 1=low to 6=high 0.25 1=low to 6=high Saint Vincent and the Grenadines

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher cpia social protection rating, Saint Vincent and the Grenadines or Togo?
Saint Vincent and the Grenadines, at 3.5 1=low to 6=high against 3.5 1=low to 6=high in Togo as of 2025.
What is the difference in cpia social protection rating between Saint Vincent and the Grenadines and Togo?
0 1=low to 6=high, with Saint Vincent and the Grenadines ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Saint Vincent and the Grenadines and Togo?
21 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2025.
How do Saint Vincent and the Grenadines and Togo rank globally for cpia social protection rating?
Saint Vincent and the Grenadines ranks 10th and Togo ranks 10th of 85 countries.
Where does this data come from?
CPIA database, World Bank Group (WBG), published as CPIA social protection rating (1=low to 6=high). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Saint Vincent and the Grenadines vs Togo: CPIA social protection rating. Statizoid, drawing on CPIA database, World Bank Group (WBG). Retrieved 12 September 2026, from https://public-sector.statizoid.com/compare/cpia-social-protection-rating-1-low-to-6-high/st-vincent-and-the-grenadines/togo/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://public-sector.statizoid.com/compare/cpia-social-protection-rating-1-low-to-6-high/st-vincent-and-the-grenadines/togo/">Saint Vincent and the Grenadines vs Togo: CPIA social protection rating</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
CPIA social protection rating (1=low to 6=high)
Unit
1=low to 6=high
Source
CPIA database, World Bank Group (WBG)
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
127 places, 2,456 data points, 2005–2025
Last refreshed

The Country Policy and Institutional Assessment (CPIA) measures the extent to which a country’s policy and institutional framework supports sustainable growth and poverty reduction, and consequently the effective use of development assistance. The outcome of the exercise yields both an overall score and scores for sixteen criteria that compose the CPIA. These criteria include: A. Economic Management (1. Monetary and Exchange Rate Policies; 2. Fiscal Policy; 3. Debt Policy and Management), B. Structural Policies (4. Trade; 5. Financial Sector; 6. Business Regulatory Environment), C. Policies for Social Inclusion/Equity (7. Gender equality; 8. Equity of public resource use; 9. Building human resources; 10. Social protection and labor; 11. Policies and institutions for environmental sustainability), D. Public Sector Management and Institutions (12. Property rights and rule-based governance; 13. Quality of budgetary and financial management; 14. Efficiency of revenue mobilization; 15. Quality of public administration; 16. Transparency, accountability, and corruption in the public sector). The Social Protection criterion assesses government policies in social protection and labor market regulations that reduce the risk of becoming poor, assist those who are poor to better manage further risks, and ensure a minimal level of welfare to all people. Specifically it evaluates social protection (SP) and labor policies, namely those engaged in risk prevention by supporting savings and risk pooling through social insurance, protection against destitution through redistributive safety net programs and promotion of human capital development and income generation, including labor market programs. It also assesses the functioning of an SP system, including its effectiveness in a crisis and in providing arrangements and incentives to help beneficiaries to move from protection to promotion and prevention, including through interactions with private, informal means of SP. The criterion covers: (a) the overall SP system; (b) social safety net programs; (c) labor markets programs and policies, namely those aiming to promote employment creation and productivity growth while protecting core labor standards and ensuring adequate working conditions; (d) local service delivery and civil society participation in community development programs; and (e) pension and old age savings programs.