Georgia vs Upper middle income: CPIA trade rating
Georgia
6 1=low to 6=high
in 2013
Upper middle income
4 1=low to 6=high
in 2025
Georgia rank
1st
Upper middle income rank
3rd
CPIA trade rating over time
- Georgia
- Upper middle income
How they compare
Georgia currently reports 6 1=low to 6=high against 4 1=low to 6=high in Upper middle income, a difference of 2 1=low to 6=high.
That makes Georgia's figure about 1.5 times Upper middle income's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 9 shared years of data; in 2005 it was Upper middle income ahead.
Georgia ranks 1st and Upper middle income ranks 3rd of 84 countries.
Georgia has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Georgia | Upper middle income | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 5.1 1=low to 6=high | 4.12 1=low to 6=high | 0.9837 1=low to 6=high | Georgia |
| 2010s | 6 1=low to 6=high | 4.28 1=low to 6=high | 1.72 1=low to 6=high | Georgia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher cpia trade rating, Georgia or Upper middle income?
- Georgia, at 6 1=low to 6=high against 4 1=low to 6=high in Upper middle income as of 2013.
- What is the difference in cpia trade rating between Georgia and Upper middle income?
- 2 1=low to 6=high, with Georgia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Georgia and Upper middle income?
- 9 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2013.
- How do Georgia and Upper middle income rank globally for cpia trade rating?
- Georgia ranks 1st and Upper middle income ranks 3rd of 84 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- CPIA database, World Bank Group (WBG), published as CPIA trade rating (1=low to 6=high). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Trade assesses how the policy framework fosters trade in goods.