Barbados vs Chinese Taipei: Cyclically adjusted balance, General government, Percent of potential
Barbados
0.5281
in 2030
Chinese Taipei
0.4666
in 2030
Barbados rank
9th
Chinese Taipei rank
10th
Cyclically adjusted balance, General government, Percent of potential over time
- Barbados
- Chinese Taipei
How they compare
Barbados currently reports 0.5281 against 0.4666 in Chinese Taipei, a difference of 0.0615.
That makes Barbados's figure about 1.1 times Chinese Taipei's.
The two have swapped places 8 times across 36 shared years of data; in 1995 it was Barbados ahead.
Barbados ranks 9th and Chinese Taipei ranks 10th of 88 countries.
Across the 5 decades both report, Barbados averaged higher in 4 and Chinese Taipei in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Barbados | Chinese Taipei | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 5.67 | -5.89 | 11.56 | Barbados |
| 2000s | -2.65 | -4.03 | 1.38 | Barbados |
| 2010s | -4.9 | -2.94 | 1.97 | Chinese Taipei |
| 2020s | -1.04 | -1.1 | 0.0674 | Barbados |
| 2030s | 0.5281 | 0.4666 | 0.0615 | Barbados |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher cyclically adjusted balance, general government, percent of potential, Barbados or Chinese Taipei?
- Barbados, at 0.5281 against 0.4666 in Chinese Taipei as of 2030.
- What is the difference in cyclically adjusted balance, general government, percent of potential between Barbados and Chinese Taipei?
- 0.0615, with Barbados ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Barbados and Chinese Taipei?
- 36 years are reported by both, from 1995 to 2030.
- How do Barbados and Chinese Taipei rank globally for cyclically adjusted balance, general government, percent of potential?
- Barbados ranks 9th and Chinese Taipei ranks 10th of 88 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- International Monetary Fund, published as Cyclically adjusted balance, General government, Percent of potential GDP. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Fiscal Monitor (FM) 2025 October