Low-Income Developing Sub-Saharan Africa vs Mauritius: Cyclically adjusted balance, General government, Percent of potential

Low-Income Developing Sub-Saharan Africa
-2.42
in 2030
Mauritius
2.42
in 2030
Low-Income Developing Sub-Saharan Africa rank
1st
Mauritius rank
2nd

Cyclically adjusted balance, General government, Percent of potential over time

  • Low-Income Developing Sub-Saharan Africa
  • Mauritius
-15-10-505199120102030

How they compare

Mauritius currently reports 2.42 against -2.42 in Low-Income Developing Sub-Saharan Africa, a difference of 4.84.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 16 shared years of data; in 2015 it was Mauritius ahead.

Low-Income Developing Sub-Saharan Africa ranks 1st and Mauritius ranks 2nd of 13 groups.

Mauritius has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Low-Income Developing Sub-Saharan Africa Mauritius Difference Ahead
2010s -6.72 -2.12 4.59 Mauritius
2020s -5.59 -2.26 3.33 Mauritius
2030s -2.42 2.42 4.83 Mauritius

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher cyclically adjusted balance, general government, percent of potential, Low-Income Developing Sub-Saharan Africa or Mauritius?
Mauritius, at 2.42 against -2.42 in Low-Income Developing Sub-Saharan Africa as of 2030.
What is the difference in cyclically adjusted balance, general government, percent of potential between Low-Income Developing Sub-Saharan Africa and Mauritius?
4.84, with Mauritius ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Low-Income Developing Sub-Saharan Africa and Mauritius?
16 years are reported by both, from 2015 to 2030.
How do Low-Income Developing Sub-Saharan Africa and Mauritius rank globally for cyclically adjusted balance, general government, percent of potential?
Low-Income Developing Sub-Saharan Africa ranks 1st and Mauritius ranks 2nd of 13 groups.
Where does this data come from?
International Monetary Fund, published as Cyclically adjusted balance, General government, Percent of potential GDP. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Low-Income Developing Sub-Saharan Africa vs Mauritius: Cyclically adjusted balance, General government, Percent of potential. Statizoid, drawing on International Monetary Fund. Retrieved 12 September 2026, from https://public-sector.statizoid.com/compare/cyclically-adjusted-balance-general-government-percent-of-potential-gdp/low-income-developing-sub-saharan-africa/mauritius/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under IMF Terms and Conditions (attribution required); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://public-sector.statizoid.com/compare/cyclically-adjusted-balance-general-government-percent-of-potential-gdp/low-income-developing-sub-saharan-africa/mauritius/">Low-Income Developing Sub-Saharan Africa vs Mauritius: Cyclically adjusted balance, General government, Percent of potential</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Cyclically adjusted balance, General government, Percent of potential GDP
Source
International Monetary Fund
Licence
IMF Terms and Conditions (attribution required)
Coverage
102 places, 3,388 data points, 1991–2030
Last refreshed

Fiscal Monitor (FM) 2025 October