Hong Kong vs North Macedonia: Cyclically adjusted primary balance, General government, Percent
Hong Kong
0.2296
in 2030
North Macedonia
-0.0024
in 2030
Hong Kong rank
37th
North Macedonia rank
40th
Cyclically adjusted primary balance, General government, Percent over time
- Hong Kong
- North Macedonia
How they compare
Hong Kong currently reports 0.2296 against -0.0024 in North Macedonia, a difference of 0.232.
That makes Hong Kong's figure about 95.2 times North Macedonia's.
The two have swapped places 6 times across 24 shared years of data; in 2007 it was Hong Kong ahead.
Hong Kong ranks 37th and North Macedonia ranks 40th of 86 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Hong Kong averaged higher in 3 and North Macedonia in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Hong Kong | North Macedonia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 0.7978 | -0.3264 | 1.12 | Hong Kong |
| 2010s | 1.72 | -1.94 | 3.66 | Hong Kong |
| 2020s | -3.99 | -2.79 | 1.2 | North Macedonia |
| 2030s | 0.2296 | -0.0024 | 0.232 | Hong Kong |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher cyclically adjusted primary balance, general government, percent of, Hong Kong or North Macedonia?
- Hong Kong, at 0.2296 against -0.0024 in North Macedonia as of 2030.
- What is the difference in cyclically adjusted primary balance, general government, percent of between Hong Kong and North Macedonia?
- 0.232, with Hong Kong ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Hong Kong and North Macedonia?
- 24 years are reported by both, from 2007 to 2030.
- How do Hong Kong and North Macedonia rank globally for cyclically adjusted primary balance, general government, percent of?
- Hong Kong ranks 37th and North Macedonia ranks 40th of 86 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- International Monetary Fund, published as Cyclically adjusted primary balance, General government, Percent of potential GDP. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Fiscal Monitor (FM) 2025 October