Costa Rica vs Mongolia: Chief executive of the government is elected
Costa Rica
1
in 2025
Mongolia
1
in 2025
Costa Rica rank
1st
Mongolia rank
1st
Chief executive of the government is elected over time
- Costa Rica
- Mongolia
How they compare
Costa Rica currently reports 1 against 1 in Mongolia, a difference of 0.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 115 shared years of data; in 1911 it was Costa Rica ahead.
Costa Rica ranks 1st and Mongolia ranks 1st of 198 countries.
Across the 12 decades both report, Costa Rica averaged higher in 2 and Mongolia in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Costa Rica | Mongolia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1910s | 0.7778 | 0 | 0.7778 | Costa Rica |
| 1920s | 1 | 0.6 | 0.4 | Costa Rica |
| 1930s | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
| 1940s | 0.9 | 1 | 0.1 | Mongolia |
| 1950s | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
| 1960s | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
| 1970s | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
| 1980s | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
| 1990s | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
| 2000s | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
| 2010s | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
| 2020s | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher chief executive of the government is elected, Costa Rica or Mongolia?
- Costa Rica, at 1 against 1 in Mongolia as of 2025.
- What is the difference in chief executive of the government is elected between Costa Rica and Mongolia?
- 0, with Costa Rica ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Costa Rica and Mongolia?
- 115 years are reported by both, from 1911 to 2025.
- How do Costa Rica and Mongolia rank globally for chief executive of the government is elected?
- Costa Rica ranks 1st and Mongolia ranks 1st of 198 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Lexical Index (2026) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Chief executive of the government is elected. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The variable indicates whether some citizens directly or indirectly elect the chief executive. It considers political system which do not govern themselves — such as due to external interventions, occupations, or colonization — as not holding executive elections.