Croatia vs Uzbekistan: Chief executive of the government is elected
Croatia
1
in 2025
Uzbekistan
1
in 2025
Croatia rank
1st
Uzbekistan rank
1st
Chief executive of the government is elected over time
- Croatia
- Uzbekistan
How they compare
Croatia currently reports 1 against 1 in Uzbekistan, a difference of 0.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 104 shared years of data; in 1922 it was Croatia ahead.
Croatia ranks 1st and Uzbekistan ranks 1st of 198 countries.
Across the 11 decades both report, Croatia averaged higher in 2 and Uzbekistan in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Croatia | Uzbekistan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1920s | 0.875 | 0 | 0.875 | Croatia |
| 1930s | 0.9 | 0.4 | 0.5 | Croatia |
| 1940s | 0.6 | 1 | 0.4 | Uzbekistan |
| 1950s | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
| 1960s | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
| 1970s | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
| 1980s | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
| 1990s | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
| 2000s | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
| 2010s | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
| 2020s | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher chief executive of the government is elected, Croatia or Uzbekistan?
- Croatia, at 1 against 1 in Uzbekistan as of 2025.
- What is the difference in chief executive of the government is elected between Croatia and Uzbekistan?
- 0, with Croatia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Croatia and Uzbekistan?
- 104 years are reported by both, from 1922 to 2025.
- How do Croatia and Uzbekistan rank globally for chief executive of the government is elected?
- Croatia ranks 1st and Uzbekistan ranks 1st of 198 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Lexical Index (2026) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Chief executive of the government is elected. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The variable indicates whether some citizens directly or indirectly elect the chief executive. It considers political system which do not govern themselves — such as due to external interventions, occupations, or colonization — as not holding executive elections.