Pakistan vs Saint Lucia: Chief executive of the government is elected
Pakistan
1
in 2025
Saint Lucia
1
in 2025
Pakistan rank
1st
Saint Lucia rank
1st
Chief executive of the government is elected over time
- Pakistan
- Saint Lucia
How they compare
Pakistan currently reports 1 against 1 in Saint Lucia, a difference of 0.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 75 shared years of data; in 1951 it was Pakistan ahead.
Pakistan ranks 1st and Saint Lucia ranks 1st of 198 countries.
Across the 8 decades both report, Pakistan averaged higher in 2 and Saint Lucia in 4.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Pakistan | Saint Lucia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1950s | 0.7778 | 0 | 0.7778 | Pakistan |
| 1960s | 0.9 | 0.3 | 0.6 | Pakistan |
| 1970s | 0.4 | 1 | 0.6 | Saint Lucia |
| 1980s | 0.6 | 1 | 0.4 | Saint Lucia |
| 1990s | 0.9 | 1 | 0.1 | Saint Lucia |
| 2000s | 0.2 | 1 | 0.8 | Saint Lucia |
| 2010s | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
| 2020s | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher chief executive of the government is elected, Pakistan or Saint Lucia?
- Pakistan, at 1 against 1 in Saint Lucia as of 2025.
- What is the difference in chief executive of the government is elected between Pakistan and Saint Lucia?
- 0, with Pakistan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Pakistan and Saint Lucia?
- 75 years are reported by both, from 1951 to 2025.
- How do Pakistan and Saint Lucia rank globally for chief executive of the government is elected?
- Pakistan ranks 1st and Saint Lucia ranks 1st of 198 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Lexical Index (2026) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Chief executive of the government is elected. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The variable indicates whether some citizens directly or indirectly elect the chief executive. It considers political system which do not govern themselves — such as due to external interventions, occupations, or colonization — as not holding executive elections.