Uzbekistan vs Western Sahara: Chief executive of the government is elected
Uzbekistan
1
in 2025
Western Sahara
1
in 2025
Uzbekistan rank
1st
Western Sahara rank
1st
Chief executive of the government is elected over time
- Uzbekistan
- Western Sahara
How they compare
Uzbekistan currently reports 1 against 1 in Western Sahara, a difference of 0.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 63 shared years of data; in 1963 it was Uzbekistan ahead.
Uzbekistan ranks 1st and Western Sahara ranks 1st of 198 countries.
Uzbekistan has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Uzbekistan | Western Sahara | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 1 | 0 | 1 | Uzbekistan |
| 1970s | 1 | 0 | 1 | Uzbekistan |
| 1980s | 1 | 0 | 1 | Uzbekistan |
| 1990s | 1 | 0 | 1 | Uzbekistan |
| 2000s | 1 | 0.2 | 0.8 | Uzbekistan |
| 2010s | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
| 2020s | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher chief executive of the government is elected, Uzbekistan or Western Sahara?
- Uzbekistan, at 1 against 1 in Western Sahara as of 2025.
- What is the difference in chief executive of the government is elected between Uzbekistan and Western Sahara?
- 0, with Uzbekistan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Uzbekistan and Western Sahara?
- 63 years are reported by both, from 1963 to 2025.
- How do Uzbekistan and Western Sahara rank globally for chief executive of the government is elected?
- Uzbekistan ranks 1st and Western Sahara ranks 1st of 198 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Lexical Index (2026) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Chief executive of the government is elected. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The variable indicates whether some citizens directly or indirectly elect the chief executive. It considers political system which do not govern themselves — such as due to external interventions, occupations, or colonization — as not holding executive elections.