Congo vs Croatia: Environmental protection
Congo
897.05 million
in 2012
Croatia
867.61 million
in 2021
Congo rank
67th
Croatia rank
68th
Environmental protection over time
- Congo
- Croatia
How they compare
Congo currently reports 897.05 million against 867.61 million in Croatia, a difference of 29.44 million.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 9 shared years of data; in 2004 it was Croatia ahead.
Congo ranks 67th and Croatia ranks 68th of 113 countries.
Congo has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Congo | Croatia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 620.31 million | 232.51 million | 387.80 million | Congo |
| 2010s | 1.87 billion | 255.98 million | 1.61 billion | Congo |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher environmental protection, Congo or Croatia?
- Congo, at 897.05 million against 867.61 million in Croatia as of 2012.
- What is the difference in environmental protection between Congo and Croatia?
- 29.44 million, with Congo ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Congo and Croatia?
- 9 years are reported by both, from 2004 to 2012.
- How do Congo and Croatia rank globally for environmental protection?
- Congo ranks 67th and Croatia ranks 68th of 113 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- International Monetary Fund, published as Environmental protection (Domestic Currency). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
This dataset captures government spending on environmental protection efforts such as pollution abatement, biodiversity conservation, and waste management. These expenditures are classified according to the COFOG framework (Classification of the Functions of Government).