Hong Kong, China vs Iceland: Environmental protection

Hong Kong, China
31.10 billion
in 2021
Iceland
28.60 billion
in 2022
Hong Kong, China rank
20th
Iceland rank
23rd

Environmental protection over time

  • Hong Kong, China
  • Iceland
010.0B20.0B30.0B200020112022

How they compare

Hong Kong, China currently reports 31.10 billion against 28.60 billion in Iceland, a difference of 2.50 billion.

That makes Hong Kong, China's figure about 1.1 times Iceland's.

Across all 20 years both countries report, Hong Kong, China has been ahead every year.

Hong Kong, China ranks 20th and Iceland ranks 23rd of 113 countries.

Hong Kong, China has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Hong Kong, China Iceland Difference Ahead
2000s 9.23 billion 7.70 billion 1.52 billion Hong Kong, China
2010s 16.15 billion 13.34 billion 2.81 billion Hong Kong, China
2020s 29.70 billion 23.98 billion 5.72 billion Hong Kong, China

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher environmental protection, Hong Kong, China or Iceland?
Hong Kong, China, at 31.10 billion against 28.60 billion in Iceland as of 2021.
What is the difference in environmental protection between Hong Kong, China and Iceland?
2.50 billion, with Hong Kong, China ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Hong Kong, China and Iceland?
20 years are reported by both, from 2002 to 2021.
How do Hong Kong, China and Iceland rank globally for environmental protection?
Hong Kong, China ranks 20th and Iceland ranks 23rd of 113 countries.
Where does this data come from?
International Monetary Fund, published as Environmental protection (Domestic Currency). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Hong Kong, China vs Iceland: Environmental protection. Statizoid, drawing on International Monetary Fund. Retrieved 05 September 2026, from https://public-sector.statizoid.com/compare/environmental-protection-domestic-currency/hong-kong-sar-china/iceland/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under IMF Terms and Conditions (attribution required); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://public-sector.statizoid.com/compare/environmental-protection-domestic-currency/hong-kong-sar-china/iceland/">Hong Kong, China vs Iceland: Environmental protection</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Environmental protection (Domestic Currency)
Source
International Monetary Fund
Licence
IMF Terms and Conditions (attribution required)
Coverage
113 places, 1,949 data points, 1995–2022
Last refreshed

This dataset captures government spending on environmental protection efforts such as pollution abatement, biodiversity conservation, and waste management. These expenditures are classified according to the COFOG framework (Classification of the Functions of Government).