Lithuania, Republic of vs Malta: Environmental protection
Environmental protection over time
- Lithuania, Republic of
- Malta
How they compare
Lithuania, Republic of currently reports 300.45 million against 194.67 million in Malta, a difference of 105.78 million.
That makes Lithuania, Republic of's figure about 1.5 times Malta's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 27 shared years of data; in 1995 it was Malta ahead.
Lithuania, Republic of ranks 83rd and Malta ranks 86th of 113 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Lithuania, Republic of averaged higher in 3 and Malta in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Lithuania, Republic of | Malta | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 15.02 million | 37.31 million | 22.30 million | Malta |
| 2000s | 129.06 million | 69.02 million | 60.04 million | Lithuania, Republic of |
| 2010s | 243.19 million | 133.02 million | 110.16 million | Lithuania, Republic of |
| 2020s | 283.20 million | 190.50 million | 92.70 million | Lithuania, Republic of |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher environmental protection, Lithuania, Republic of or Malta?
- Lithuania, Republic of, at 300.45 million against 194.67 million in Malta as of 2021.
- What is the difference in environmental protection between Lithuania, Republic of and Malta?
- 105.78 million, with Lithuania, Republic of ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Lithuania, Republic of and Malta?
- 27 years are reported by both, from 1995 to 2021.
- How do Lithuania, Republic of and Malta rank globally for environmental protection?
- Lithuania, Republic of ranks 83rd and Malta ranks 86th of 113 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- International Monetary Fund, published as Environmental protection (Domestic Currency). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
This dataset captures government spending on environmental protection efforts such as pollution abatement, biodiversity conservation, and waste management. These expenditures are classified according to the COFOG framework (Classification of the Functions of Government).